I have been paying attention. And I know the previous plot lines were shaken up a bit when Peter disappeared. So Bell's actions are based in Dr Bishop's loss of his son, which would not have been there in the previous timeline.
And Jones was allegedly not smart enough to have done it all on his own.
So what was he doing in the first few seasons? What was the point of that?
I am beginning to feel that the first two or three years of the show were wasted time.
And Jones was allegedly not smart enough to have done it all on his own.
So what was he doing in the first few seasons? What was the point of that?
I am beginning to feel that the first two or three years of the show were wasted time.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
So, Fringe *spoilers for end of season 4*
17/05/2012 09:25:42 AM
- 783 Views
One of the theories i have read-and that I feel has merit- is...
18/05/2012 02:27:06 AM
- 665 Views
Re: One of the theories i have read-and that I feel has merit- is...
18/05/2012 05:14:01 AM
- 797 Views
But that makes little sense
18/05/2012 07:19:01 AM
- 614 Views
I would need to rewatch, but
18/05/2012 02:41:27 PM
- 696 Views
Walter wrote the book about the coming war in the timeline where he stole Peter.
24/05/2012 05:07:04 AM
- 642 Views
Re: So, Fringe *spoilers for end of season 4*
18/05/2012 05:12:02 AM
- 584 Views
B5 actually had to condense its plot to 4 seasons, got renewed, and threw together Season 5.
24/05/2012 05:08:04 AM
- 636 Views