Yes, what have bombers done without fighter screens over the last 100 years?
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 12/05/2012 05:44:32 PM
Shield aren't supposed to be about fighting conventional wars - they are about spying and fast reaction and flexibility.... all of which having a mobile, stealth headquarters fits with perfectly. How useful it would be in an actual war isn't relevant, though you are off with your comments there anyway as of course having the ability to put up a fighter screen to defend your ship is very obviously useful - see Battlestar Galactica etc.
Other air attack weapons had fighter escorts in the past without having the capacity to carry them. All the helicarrier does to that end is increase the chance that your "fighter screen" might be uselessly parked on board when bad guys come calling, instead of alertly flying escort duty. BTW, how much good DID that fighter screen do when Hawkeye came calling? IIRC, a single plane got with the helicarrier, which would never happen against a real life aircraft carrier.
And regarding stealth and covert ops, the ONLY FLYING SHIP in the world is not remotely conducive to that sort of thing. At all. Only if they have magic invisibility technology and magic radar diversion technology, in which case why not put those on something more reasonably and practically sized? "Come on boy, turn this baby around! We have to go to Beijing to exfiltrate a covert operative, then on to Syria to insert a commando unit, then to South America to interdict some narco-terrorists. You could probably afford, for the price of a helicarrier, 30 or so of those VTOL craft they use to board the carrier in the first place, which would be far more useful, operating from a HQ that stays at sea level, and which would appear to have a superior stealth profile.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated)
05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM
- 1380 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc
05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM
- 830 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc
05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM
- 910 Views
The Heli-Carrier is well established in the Marvel Universe as S.H.I.E.L.D.'s base of operations.
05/05/2012 12:12:57 PM
- 635 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier.
05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM
- 637 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier.
07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
- 638 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc
06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM
- 662 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird
07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM
- 701 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird
08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM
- 648 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk.
09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM
- 579 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk.
09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM
- 582 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with.
14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM
- 587 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier?
07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM
- 575 Views
Yes, what have bombers done without fighter screens over the last 100 years?
12/05/2012 05:44:32 PM
- 707 Views
Got shot down a lot, in major confilcts against foes with air power.
12/05/2012 08:38:00 PM
- 548 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers)
07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM
- 612 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers)
07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM
- 809 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie.
14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM
- 593 Views
???
15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM
- 543 Views
I was just continuing the discussion. Could've replied to same one as you, yeah. *NM*
16/05/2012 01:16:08 AM
- 316 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers)
07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM
- 670 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes.
07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM
- 679 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS*
14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM
- 596 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS*
15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM
- 595 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS*
16/05/2012 01:18:34 AM
- 745 Views