Active Users:1128 Time:14/11/2024 06:05:09 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
There were some. nossy Send a noteboard - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM
Others that spring to mind:

*Why would an alien race invade earth if they cannot stop nuclear missles, we have 1000's of the damn things, i'm sure they knew this. And why did we need the avengers at all? It was laughably easy, just shoot a damn nuke into the whole.

But I think this can be explained with: vengeance and underestimation.

*Why would the aliens decide all of a sudden to hold people hostage in a bank, when uptil then they've just been shooting? (Other than a desperate search for something for Captain Sweatpants to do)

Never really thought about that, didn't care and don't now. It's amusing to see things other people thought were odd. :P

*How on earth don't shield know that one of their planes is missing, and why haven't they changed callsigns after one of their chief operatives switched sides. I mean come on, what kind of elite intelligence agency is this?

One that has elite people who can steal planes w/o it being noticed for a moment?

*Why didn't anyone have a gun, especially Captain America who spent most of his 1st movie...shooting a gun.

Dunno, don't care. I still think the gun argument is sort of odd, given that we were going to see a movie that could have been titled Fun with Superheroes. Sure it makes a bit of a plot hole, but, wow, how much do I not care.

*Why weren't the fighter jets getting involved? They can launch missiles from 100 miles out ffs, and the baddies had already shown they couldn't dodge a damn arrow/shield/fist/anything.

Launch missiles at Manhattan to hit things the size of lawnmowers? I can see that with the armor plated thingies, but then you're still setting off numerous large explosions over New York (not that the Avengers were exactly non-destructive, mind you).

etc etc.

Sure there were things, but I'm super glad to see you say you still enjoyed it. Because it takes waaay too much energy to be annoyed by these things when they can be explained away, if imperfectly.

Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) Cannoli - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1375 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc Cannoli - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 826 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc Sidious - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 903 Views
You guys are weird. nossy - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 682 Views
You're wierd Cannoli - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 612 Views
I know. nossy - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 581 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc dacole - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 625 Views
The Heli-Carrier is well established in the Marvel Universe as S.H.I.E.L.D.'s base of operations. MightyYT - 05/05/2012 12:12:57 PM 632 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. Werthead - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 630 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 633 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... TaskmasterJack - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 649 Views
Nah nossy - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 629 Views
Re: Nah TaskmasterJack - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 541 Views
Re: Nah nossy - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 622 Views
Re: Nah TaskmasterJack - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 647 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc nossy - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 656 Views
True ironclad - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 630 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc Cannoli - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 703 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird beetnemesis - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 693 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird nossy - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 644 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. HyogaRott - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 576 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. nossy - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 576 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. HyogaRott - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 584 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? snoopcester - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 570 Views
Yes, what have bombers done without fighter screens over the last 100 years? Cannoli - 12/05/2012 05:44:32 PM 704 Views
Got shot down a lot, in major confilcts against foes with air power. snoopcester - 12/05/2012 08:38:00 PM 545 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* Tom - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 361 Views
Yes *NM* Cannoli - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 280 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) beetnemesis - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 610 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) TaskmasterJack - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 804 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. Arok Manok - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 591 Views
??? TaskmasterJack - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 540 Views
I was just continuing the discussion. Could've replied to same one as you, yeah. *NM* Arok Manok - 16/05/2012 01:16:08 AM 314 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) beetnemesis - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 665 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. Wibble - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 671 Views
There were some. nossy - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 713 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns HyogaRott - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 797 Views
On the bank snoopcester - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 601 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene HyogaRott - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 569 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" MightyYT - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 613 Views
This, plus: ironclad - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 699 Views
It's an id thing. Arok Manok - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 639 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* HyogaRott - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 300 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* Arok Manok - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 591 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* TaskmasterJack - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 589 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* Arok Manok - 16/05/2012 01:18:34 AM 736 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes