Active Users:440 Time:17/04/2025 12:27:20 PM
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole Send a noteboard - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
It'd be like having Batman and never once showing the Batcave or Batmobile. You could do it and get away with it, but fans would whine.

I do wonder if by showing how easily it was almost taken out and having Banner go on about how it submerging would be cooler, that Whedon wasn't lampshading the lunacy of the concept and explaining why he won't use it in the future. Maybe in THE AVENGERS 2 (or the next time SHIELD shows up) they'll have a Sub-Carrier instead?


I suspect you are right. Whedon does things like that...and yes a submersible carrier now THAT would be badass.
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1448 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 900 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 994 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 755 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 688 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 657 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 693 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 670 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 707 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 716 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 704 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 614 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 700 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 725 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 738 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 702 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 767 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 762 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 715 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 651 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 659 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 666 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 648 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 394 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 309 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 681 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 877 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 667 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 612 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 734 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 717 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 776 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 868 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 673 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 637 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 681 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 777 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 723 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 334 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 682 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 660 Views

Reply to Message