Active Users:1135 Time:22/11/2024 02:52:51 PM
That premise is the equivalent of public domain - it's so unoriginal you can't call plagiarism Cannoli Send a noteboard - 23/04/2012 03:40:26 PM
I don't believe the woman who wrote The Hunger Games when she says she didn't know about the cult Japanese book and movie, Battle Royale. The premise is too similar, as is the development of the plot. There are some key differences that I will shortly highlight, but I watched both back to back, and want to post a comparative review.

First, the Japanese movie is far superior. It lacks the melodrama and personal focus of Hunger Games, and takes place in a very near future or alternate present. The movie doesn't waste time with bad clichés and slow exposition and moves immediately to the slaughter, letting us know when each of the 42 contestants dies, and showing us the gory details. Quentin Tarantino named this movie one of his all-time favorites.

The US movie is a vomitous melodrama where the main character consistently acts in an idealized manner, against a backdrop of cheap propaganda clichés (institutionalized exploitation of proud and honest poor rural hicks by evil, rich, egotistical and degenerate city-dwellers), something bound to excite viewers with an active victimization complex. It shares aspects of an equally bad movie, which was called, I believe, In Time and had Justin Timberlake in the main role, mainly the economic exploitation line. The coal miners' union probably loved this steaming pile of horseshit.

Second, the movie taints Triple Falls, Bridle Vail Falls and the DuPont Forest area of North Carolina, places I love and remember fondly. Stupid emo chicks will now swarm these lovely locations so they can vicariously feel victimized and rage against the machine.

Finally, the premise of the US movie is awful. It makes no sense. The Japanese movie condemns entire classes of juvenile delinquents, combining societal pressure with reality TV. The Hunger Games has this stupid tribute idea, which no society would ever contemplate. It makes no sense.

Fuck them all, and fuck The Hunger Games. Battle Royale was so, so much better. It had that ultra happy hot Japanese chick explaining how you blow up if you take your collar off.


The whole point of the tribute concept was that it was imposed by a totalitarian government to punish the society, and makes no less sense than conscription or enslavement or human sacrifice or rulers ordering the razing of rebellious cities or any number of other atrocities committed frequently by humans over the course of our illustrious history.

Fuck as well all the pretentious douches whose posts on this site are thinly disguised bragging about their the foreign films, books and languages they are familiar with, in apparent service to the absurd belief this is evidence of any sort of intellectual or cultural superiority on their part.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale - 23/04/2012 02:11:03 AM 1068 Views
I don't wanna defend HG all that much... - 23/04/2012 08:44:00 AM 753 Views
This - 23/04/2012 03:41:17 PM 747 Views
Agree with all of this as well. *NM* - 23/04/2012 10:07:21 PM 332 Views
That premise is the equivalent of public domain - it's so unoriginal you can't call plagiarism - 23/04/2012 03:40:26 PM 917 Views
You're such a fucking idiot. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:22:47 PM 364 Views
*NM* - 23/04/2012 05:14:55 PM 300 Views
Me likey both - 23/04/2012 09:33:16 PM 735 Views
Re: Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale - 23/04/2012 11:22:34 PM 675 Views
I posit: THG raised awareness of Battle Royale - 25/04/2012 08:22:16 PM 755 Views
My only comment is: - 27/04/2012 10:10:49 AM 1124 Views
i don't understand this hunger games stuff - 01/05/2012 10:22:04 PM 884 Views

Reply to Message