The blockbuster/SF loving reviewer (usually, he's certainly not prejudiced against entertainment) on my favourite local radio show just gave it a disastrous review, starting by saying with movies like this or the Phantom Menace a reviewer must go see it and analyze it with his "child's heart" or the exercize is pointless... to add that even then in the case of John Carter it proves completelyuseless to attempt to review what is more a corpse than a movie and what it deserves is an autopsy.
Some of his points:
"It's an adaptation that comes way too late - a losing and stupid idea to bring to the screen a nearly 100 y.o. novel that's been pillaged by cinema and pop culture so much that's it's lost all that made it original or relevant and make it look like a rip-off of all the space opera/SF movies of the twentieth century instead of one of their source of inspiration. We've seen everything in it tons and tons of times before, and since 1977 we've seen that done much, much better, in better and more entertaining movies."
"It's a painting by numbers and it commits the biggest crime any blockbuster can commit: failing to entertain."
"Puerile and retarded - if you thought Jar-Jar was the unbeatable all-time low in the history of space opera, prepared to be surprised. No focus, total failure to bring anything of interest or new to the themes it attempts to deal with. No redeeming qualities adults viewers can fall back on since "watching it like SW with a kid's heart" fails - the VFX are average at best, the action is boring, the screenplay is horrible and the performances are either abysmal or cartoonish, making Hayden\Anakin and Natalie Portan/Padmé look Oscar worthy - a complete waste of money on big names.
He concluded by saying that rather than anyone starved for such a movie should consider even taking another dose of Jar-Jar over losing their time and money to go see this, or much better, watch or rewatch THX-1138 - with a completely different tone and even genre, but to see how exploring similar themes can be done with brilliance and relevance.
He also pointed out that to release it in March, Disney clearly seemed to want to get it out of the way and forgotten when the real blockbuster season begins.
He predicted the movie might have a good opening week-end as people are curious, before word-of-mouth makes it take its big plunge.
Some of his points:
"It's an adaptation that comes way too late - a losing and stupid idea to bring to the screen a nearly 100 y.o. novel that's been pillaged by cinema and pop culture so much that's it's lost all that made it original or relevant and make it look like a rip-off of all the space opera/SF movies of the twentieth century instead of one of their source of inspiration. We've seen everything in it tons and tons of times before, and since 1977 we've seen that done much, much better, in better and more entertaining movies."
"It's a painting by numbers and it commits the biggest crime any blockbuster can commit: failing to entertain."
"Puerile and retarded - if you thought Jar-Jar was the unbeatable all-time low in the history of space opera, prepared to be surprised. No focus, total failure to bring anything of interest or new to the themes it attempts to deal with. No redeeming qualities adults viewers can fall back on since "watching it like SW with a kid's heart" fails - the VFX are average at best, the action is boring, the screenplay is horrible and the performances are either abysmal or cartoonish, making Hayden\Anakin and Natalie Portan/Padmé look Oscar worthy - a complete waste of money on big names.
He concluded by saying that rather than anyone starved for such a movie should consider even taking another dose of Jar-Jar over losing their time and money to go see this, or much better, watch or rewatch THX-1138 - with a completely different tone and even genre, but to see how exploring similar themes can be done with brilliance and relevance.
He also pointed out that to release it in March, Disney clearly seemed to want to get it out of the way and forgotten when the real blockbuster season begins.
He predicted the movie might have a good opening week-end as people are curious, before word-of-mouth makes it take its big plunge.
This message last edited by DomA on 09/03/2012 at 03:45:26 PM
John Carter. It's being declared a flop weeks ahead of it's premiere.
25/02/2012 12:49:00 AM
- 910 Views
I'd like to see it, but only at the discounted matinee ticket price. *NM*
25/02/2012 01:39:11 AM
- 247 Views
Screw that, it's still my most anticipated movie of 2012.
27/02/2012 03:02:13 PM
- 1642 Views
So I can tell you who's going to see this movie: me, my sister, my boyfriend, his brothers...
27/02/2012 03:05:41 PM
- 622 Views
Its cast is awesome enough that I might consider watching it.
03/03/2012 05:46:57 PM
- 422 Views
Yes, do. It's even better than twilight. *NM*
11/03/2012 09:50:24 PM
- 263 Views
LOL. That doesn't sell many people on the film. *NM*
11/03/2012 11:41:21 PM
- 195 Views
Well, he saw Twilight on my recommendation and didn't hate it, so in this case it might work
12/03/2012 02:56:20 AM
- 485 Views
Did you make him watch the first three first? Or did he go in cold? *NM*
13/03/2012 10:57:58 PM
- 206 Views
Breaking Dawn Part One was entertaining enough, I had a good time.
12/03/2012 10:09:00 PM
- 431 Views
It looks like some reviewers agree
09/03/2012 03:42:17 PM
- 542 Views