Active Users:1102 Time:23/11/2024 02:01:06 AM
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 29/02/2012 06:33:07 PM

Lucas tought Maul had become too instantly iconic, à la Vader. He went for a little more subdued villains on purpose. With Dooku he wanted an understated character closer to Tarkin, and Grievious as a cyborg was largely designed to be a transitional character (who was largely there to split Anakin from Obi-Wan). There are two main villains in the prequels: what goes on within Anakin, and Palpatine. Lucas had to be subtle with Palpatine, not to preserve "the surprise" as so many misjudged, but so Palpatine could credibly deceive the characters down to Yoda. In the third episode he steals the show. Lucas didn't want the Sith apprentices to undermine what happens in the third episode.


I think the problem I'm having with your posts is that you simultaneously talk about how it's for 7-10 year olds (which I acknowledge) and then extol subtle, delayed stuff like this that no 7-10 year old would appreciate.

And I'm sorry, but saying "Episodes 1 and 2 need to be subdued and kind of boring so the third movie really POPS" is just wrong, and bad. I don't know if that was Lucas's rationale, but I hope not.

Yes, the movies are part of two trilogies, which together make up one big story. But they're also self-contained in their own right- it's not like it's a TV series where the monster of the week is small potatoes compared to the Big Bad at the end of the season.


I'm just saying, if you create a character that instantly captures the audience's imagination, you shouldn't regret it.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
What if Episode 1 was good? - 28/02/2012 05:11:40 AM 1055 Views
thank you. this is awesome. *NM* - 28/02/2012 05:47:36 AM 312 Views
He has some good points - 28/02/2012 11:32:49 AM 565 Views
Which were which? *NM* - 28/02/2012 02:46:40 PM 227 Views
Talking people are annoying, especially when their first idea is stupid - 28/02/2012 01:51:50 PM 577 Views
Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 02:55:46 PM 683 Views
Re: Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 04:22:16 PM 724 Views
This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 06:54:00 PM 524 Views
Re: This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 11:27:02 PM 592 Views
Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 28/02/2012 07:42:43 PM 451 Views
Qui-Gon is the protagonist if you absolutely need one (though I don't know why you do) - 28/02/2012 10:59:23 PM 499 Views
Eh. It wasn't much of an "ensemble," either - 29/02/2012 06:23:23 PM 572 Views
You don't really need character development either - 29/02/2012 07:56:09 PM 562 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 12:16:51 AM 509 Views
Well said - 29/02/2012 08:39:36 AM 565 Views
Re: Well said - 02/03/2012 04:51:49 PM 543 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 06:33:07 PM 455 Views
Actually, I didn't get that far. The guy annoyed me so much I shut it off after the last point - 28/02/2012 06:45:43 PM 546 Views
Hah, I do! - 28/02/2012 07:55:52 PM 443 Views
Now I want Facebook posts for WoT - 29/02/2012 07:47:31 PM 615 Views
I just hate beets - 01/03/2012 05:18:41 PM 475 Views
Who here thinks they could make a better Episode I ? - 06/03/2012 06:43:58 PM 447 Views
Of course they'd all raise their hands - 07/03/2012 12:34:30 PM 488 Views
The point was that there's nothing special about this guy. - 08/03/2012 01:02:32 AM 528 Views

Reply to Message