Active Users:1087 Time:22/11/2024 12:26:44 PM
In some places it's exactly that Brian Send a noteboard - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM
If a speed limit sign is obscured by a bush and I'm unable to see it that makes me ignorant of the law. You can't get a traffic ticket for that. I've seen it successfully fought.

I think a better example would be an obscure traffic law rather than the speed limit. For example if you turn over an "imaginary island" you can be ticketed. There's nothing to prevent you from driving over one, and many people wouldn't have the foggiest as to what an imaginary island is, but in spite of this you can be ticketed for driving over one.

I got a ticket for doing that once, and tried the I don't know what that is, so how could I be expected to follow a law whose existence I had absolutely no knowledge of? The judge gave the exact same response Stephen did: "Ignorance of the law is not a valid defense."


Is it one of those spots at an intersection outlined with thick white stripes and has white stripes pointed diagonally through it, that's what's coming to my mind.

In others it's simply a spot where the yellow lines separate and there is a section of road between them. Nothing painted through it or anything, and it can actually look a lot like a simple turn lane. The one you're describing seems like common sense that you couldn't drive on, the other sort.....maybe it is common knowledge, maybe not, I certainly didn't know you couldn't drive on them at the time.
Reply to message
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal? - 19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM 1357 Views
Hmmm - 19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM 1000 Views
I think - 19/01/2011 05:11:56 PM 924 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM 1011 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM 1100 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits. - 20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM 961 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years. - 20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM 826 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM* - 21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM 442 Views
How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM 914 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:09:19 PM 974 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:19:46 PM 831 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM 1336 Views
What is an imaginary island? - 23/01/2011 04:47:40 AM 962 Views
In some places it's exactly that - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM 1195 Views
A lot of it's volume. - 19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM 889 Views
Your argument lacks merit. - 19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM 907 Views
Agreed. - 19/01/2011 06:01:13 PM 799 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really. - 19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM 1032 Views
That's what I mean right there. - 19/01/2011 06:48:38 PM 981 Views
The punishable crime is - 21/01/2011 01:57:54 PM 978 Views
Re: Your argument lacks merit. - 20/01/2011 03:40:20 PM 853 Views
In my opinion - 19/01/2011 09:22:29 PM 930 Views
The battle is over, the internet won - 19/01/2011 10:12:50 PM 902 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort. - 19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM 1011 Views
Very interesting. - 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM 1038 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland. - 19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM 931 Views
I saw. - 19/01/2011 10:41:27 PM 832 Views
It won't get you very many points. - 19/01/2011 10:37:26 PM 802 Views
I would set me up for tortellini. - 19/01/2011 10:40:45 PM 827 Views
Also in most circumstances you could use "trot" instead. *NM* - 19/01/2011 10:42:26 PM 505 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot - 19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM 855 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song - 22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM 793 Views

Reply to Message