Active Users:1178 Time:22/11/2024 11:34:08 PM
It's the sexualisation of a legal minor Wibble Send a noteboard - 23/01/2011 02:21:16 AM
how? why?
Clearly you are no longer a child. It is not the type of body that would appeal to pedophiles, who prey on children.

I don't get it.


And it's the same in the UK. You can't have Page 3 girls or porn actors under 18 anymore as it is explicitly sexual.

This is were we get down to teh difference bewteen UK and US, a naked guy running down a street in a TV show is not viewed as sexual in the UK.
Reply to message
MTV and Child Porn - 20/01/2011 03:07:20 PM 1000 Views
I find the idea that a 17-yearold is covered by child porn laws strange - 20/01/2011 03:44:46 PM 470 Views
I think 18 is the cut-off for child porn in most places, regardless of the age of consent. *NM* - 20/01/2011 08:26:30 PM 190 Views
... - 20/01/2011 08:27:56 PM 467 Views
In fairness, there are other considerations than just what turns pedophiles on. - 20/01/2011 08:35:45 PM 450 Views
Yes, better safe than sorry, imo - 20/01/2011 10:31:13 PM 441 Views
It's the sexualisation of a legal minor - 23/01/2011 02:21:16 AM 444 Views
So do I - 26/01/2011 12:19:25 AM 411 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 26/01/2011 09:35:07 AM 173 Views
I don't know the show... - 20/01/2011 04:10:27 PM 484 Views
I don't think it's necessarily a scandal - 21/01/2011 01:48:27 AM 493 Views
Why's that an issue? - 20/01/2011 09:17:53 PM 456 Views
Also a fair point. *NM* - 20/01/2011 09:56:46 PM 175 Views
You're joking....right? - 20/01/2011 09:58:58 PM 458 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 10:57:32 PM 509 Views
Ha, those points about reality tv are spot on. - 20/01/2011 11:18:27 PM 488 Views
That's not fair. - 21/01/2011 08:30:35 PM 477 Views
Who watches this stuff, anyway? *NM* - 24/01/2011 04:01:08 PM 166 Views

Reply to Message