This is a question I ask myself from time-to-time as I download TV shows and movies from various less than legal sources. The obvious answer is, "It's illegal because you're not buying the DVDs and that is screwing everyone involved in making said movie/TV show out of their fair share of the money that would be made." Or even, "It's copyright infringement pure and simple and that's what makes it illegal." Maybe I'm just trying to justify my actions, but I feel like neither of these really makes sense. Back in the days of using a VCR I would record a show on a video cassette and re-watch it many times. I would even let friends borrow the tapes and watch them if they enjoyed what I had recorded. How is that different from downloading torrents? I never bought the DVDs when I was watching TV this way. Therefore the companies responsible for the shows or movies never lost any money. Even today I can DVR an episode of TV and watch it weeks later. If I choose to I could hook a VCR up to my TV and use it to copy the DVRed program to a tape and lend that out to the four people in the world that still use their VCRs on a regular basis.
I guess because they already made money when the show aired. But they never made money from the dvds. That would be my guess. But then again you could argue that its really the retailers getting screwed but they already bought the dvds and can't sell them. So I guess Walmart is the victim here lol. Poor them
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal?
19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM
- 1357 Views
Hmmm
19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM
- 1000 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows
19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM
- 1011 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows
19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM
- 1099 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits.
20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM
- 961 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years.
20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM
- 826 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM*
21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM
- 442 Views
How do you figure that?
21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM
- 914 Views
Re: How do you figure that?
22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM
- 1336 Views
A lot of it's volume.
19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM
- 889 Views
Your argument lacks merit.
19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM
- 907 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really.
19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM
- 1032 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort.
19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM
- 1011 Views
Very interesting.
19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM
- 1038 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland.
19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM
- 931 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot
19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM
- 855 Views
The case that decided information can't be stolen dates from 1987.
20/01/2011 09:35:31 AM
- 1607 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song
22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM
- 793 Views
Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems
19/01/2011 11:35:31 PM
- 962 Views
Re: Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems *NM*
19/01/2011 11:37:56 PM
- 422 Views
Re: Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems
20/01/2011 12:49:55 AM
- 1186 Views