Active Users:366 Time:10/04/2025 07:13:38 PM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 754 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 535 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 505 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 651 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 579 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 640 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 517 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 520 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 553 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 589 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 614 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 592 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 514 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 469 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 482 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 472 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 603 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 508 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 538 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 519 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 509 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 578 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 578 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 611 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 500 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 636 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 632 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 634 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 601 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 532 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 522 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 544 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 499 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 452 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 500 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 533 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 225 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 229 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 218 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 238 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 476 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 522 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 515 Views

Reply to Message