That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
Plus, I don't think the OP was referring to actual rule but more like combat skills and such.
Maybe, but just because a guy could take Obama in a fight doesn't mean he's more powerful.
I guess it depends on your definition of "strength."
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
- 1335 Views
To make them a scary menace
11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
- 910 Views
. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
- 536 Views
Precisely.
12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
- 874 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
- 1122 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
- 1114 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
- 950 Views
Mno
11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
- 952 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
- 912 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
- 533 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
- 643 Views
12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
- 894 Views
It makes sense
12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
- 909 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
- 736 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 933 Views
Not they don't Edited
11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
- 880 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
- 554 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
- 380 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
- 504 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
- 829 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
- 853 Views
Nonsense
11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
- 890 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
- 446 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
- 551 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
- 882 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
- 752 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
- 811 Views
It doesn't matter.
12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
- 778 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
- 789 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
- 922 Views
Because they're more powerful
12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
- 979 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
- 831 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
- 829 Views