that something like this is how the "undertrained whiner" won.
The Jedi hadn't faced a serious threat in x many years and didn't believe a serious one would arise until it was too late. The Sith knew there was one but were too self confident in their own powers to imagine that threat could defeat them.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
- 1334 Views
To make them a scary menace
11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
- 910 Views
. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
- 536 Views
Precisely.
12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
- 874 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
- 1122 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
- 1113 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
- 949 Views
Mno
11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
- 951 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
- 912 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
- 533 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
- 643 Views
12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
- 894 Views
It makes sense
12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
- 908 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
- 736 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 932 Views
Not they don't Edited
11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
- 879 Views
there's also a good chance
12/08/2010 03:26:47 AM
- 796 Views
The same but different
12/08/2010 09:53:10 PM
- 911 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
- 554 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
- 380 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
- 504 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
- 828 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
- 851 Views
Nonsense
11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
- 890 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
- 446 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
- 551 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
- 882 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
- 751 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
- 811 Views
It doesn't matter.
12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
- 777 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
- 789 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
- 920 Views
Because they're more powerful
12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
- 979 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
- 830 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
- 829 Views