It makes sense for when there are multiple sith at a time (note the rule of two didn't occur until after the Old Republic games, and in the last 100 years after the two trilogies it has been broken completely), two things happened
1) The sith killed each other due to infighting
2) When there was multiple sith the jedi did their best to hunt down the sith.
Now since the rule of two, the jedi believed the sith to be extinct. Furthermore the apprentice never challenges the master till he is confident he will win. If he fails the master kills him for he is too weak and thus not a worthy successor and thus tries to find another apprentice.
1) The sith killed each other due to infighting
2) When there was multiple sith the jedi did their best to hunt down the sith.
Now since the rule of two, the jedi believed the sith to be extinct. Furthermore the apprentice never challenges the master till he is confident he will win. If he fails the master kills him for he is too weak and thus not a worthy successor and thus tries to find another apprentice.
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
- 1402 Views
To make them a scary menace
11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
- 986 Views
. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
- 564 Views
Precisely.
12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
- 940 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
- 1164 Views


Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
- 1196 Views
12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
- 954 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
- 1024 Views
Mno
11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
- 1020 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
- 958 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
- 562 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
- 673 Views

It makes sense
12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
- 992 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
- 802 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 999 Views
Not they don't Edited
11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
- 923 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
- 586 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
- 407 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
- 535 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
- 897 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
- 925 Views

Nonsense
11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
- 957 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
- 475 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
- 605 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
- 960 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
- 810 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
- 871 Views
It doesn't matter.
12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
- 847 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
- 868 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
- 991 Views

Because they're more powerful
12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
- 1076 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
- 904 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
- 904 Views