After some of the things that we saw Bill had been keeping I am no longer sure his motives are as simple as just getting sookie back or as pure as they once might have been..
I excluded Sam because he doesn't seem to be wrestling with the same issues as the others. I think his conflict centers on rather weak external forces, i.e. his family, vs. rather strong internal forces (his desire to be a protect his brother, abandonment issues). I'm not saying it's not a good story, it's just very different from the rest of the plot.
Everyone else's issues I would sum up as : strong internal desire (getting bill back, revenge, protecting sookie & pam) vs. way stronger external forces (the 3000 year old king, magister, V-wolves, etc).
Everyone else's issues I would sum up as : strong internal desire (getting bill back, revenge, protecting sookie & pam) vs. way stronger external forces (the 3000 year old king, magister, V-wolves, etc).
True Blood....Cannoli might actually be right.
- 27/07/2010 06:24:30 AM
786 Views
The metaphore was let go of quite a while ago, I think?
- 27/07/2010 12:30:33 PM
476 Views
Re: The metaphore was let go of quite a while ago, I think?
- 27/07/2010 06:26:54 PM
451 Views
I don't really see them still using it...
- 28/07/2010 08:35:36 AM
431 Views
The gay metaphor was around for, like, half a season.
- 27/07/2010 12:57:08 PM
520 Views
I thought it was about being entertained.
- 27/07/2010 05:01:31 PM
450 Views
Then go watch some mindless TV show. There are plenty of them out there to pick from.
- 28/07/2010 12:28:46 AM
500 Views
I didn't say it was dumb. And I didn't say it didn't make me THINK
- 28/07/2010 02:44:01 AM
428 Views
Don't forget Sam and his struggles in that bunch. *NM*
- 28/07/2010 12:25:04 AM
186 Views