Active Users:1161 Time:23/11/2024 03:27:08 AM
*laughs* Yunalesca Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 11:26:47 AM
She should at least be able to show what the character is feeling. Where was the wide-eyed fear hardening into resolution when she cut herself to distract Victoria? Where were any other emotional transitions? She just looks pissed all the time.

Bella is about as deep as a puddle, but she still feels. Edward has to read her face and not her mind... can he read Kristen Stewart? In Breaking Dawn (the book) Bella becomes a very dynamic character. Is Kristen going to ruin the finale of a good story that has been kicked repeatedly? Most likely. That is because SHE (not Bella) has no depth OR emotional range.


"good story"? breaking dawn sucked ass.

Stewart does have emotional depth/range/ whatever. i've seen her in several other films and thought she was pretty good. obviously when given a role with actual depth Stewart gives it her all
*MySmiley*
The best things in life are weird:
https://www.youtube.com/user/Paigeofmaces

“Brave Hobo, defend me as I flee!”
I have the face of a philosopher-king
Reply to message
Twilight Saga: Eclipse movie. Pretty good overall... - 17/07/2010 07:18:23 AM 736 Views
Did it have the complete lack of plot/cinematic quality that characterized the first movie? *NM* - 17/07/2010 08:22:05 AM 245 Views
It's Twilight, so yeah. *NM* - 17/07/2010 03:52:15 PM 262 Views
I enjoyed it! *NM* - 17/07/2010 02:19:45 PM 303 Views
Stewart is the only reason I'll ever check out the series - 17/07/2010 05:23:15 PM 611 Views
With the shades shut? *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:50:10 AM 225 Views
I am cool with no one else finding her hot - 18/07/2010 01:11:24 PM 579 Views
Re: I am cool with no one else finding her hot - 19/07/2010 04:48:44 AM 573 Views
Yeah yeah - 19/07/2010 12:16:54 PM 595 Views
Stewart plays Bella well seeing as Bella has no depth what so ever *NM* - 18/07/2010 07:15:36 PM 265 Views
Yup. *NM* - 18/07/2010 08:25:44 PM 245 Views
Depth and range of emotion are not the same. - 20/07/2010 02:14:02 AM 583 Views
*laughs* - 20/07/2010 11:26:47 AM 606 Views

Reply to Message