Active Users:1049 Time:22/11/2024 05:14:54 PM
Re: In the long run, Nathan Fillion's butt had more potential. Danae al'Thor Send a noteboard - 23/06/2010 07:26:06 AM
I'd say that what makes Firefly so good is precisely that that is not all it has to lean on.


I love the series. I do. But I think I loved it more for its presentation and characters than for its plot. It didn't have sustainability, for me. I think I'd've watched it the way I watched the last two seasons of Buffy. They're all there, I love them, I wish like hell they'd do something sensible now.
http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
Reply to message
Why Firefly was so good - 19/06/2010 12:51:12 PM 764 Views
I don't think that was the draw for most of its fans. *NM* - 19/06/2010 04:23:09 PM 212 Views
Yeah, you're pretty much wrong *NM* - 19/06/2010 07:46:06 PM 272 Views
It is not why the show was good. *NM* - 19/06/2010 10:39:39 PM 243 Views
So why did you think it was good? *NM* - 25/06/2010 10:27:08 PM 270 Views
Kaylee's ass, of course. *NM* - 25/06/2010 10:28:10 PM 230 Views
Nobody has ever been more wrong than you are in this post. *NM* - 20/06/2010 12:30:36 AM 222 Views
I think if you polled all the Browncoats, particularly those who supported the show from the start, - 20/06/2010 01:21:26 AM 510 Views
I expected more of you - 20/06/2010 02:09:32 AM 555 Views
Re: I expected more of you - 20/06/2010 03:10:48 AM 529 Views
Seconded. *NM* - 20/06/2010 12:37:25 AM 257 Views
Thirded. *NM* - 20/06/2010 05:18:26 AM 213 Views
If you miss his hotness, watch Castle! *NM* - 20/06/2010 02:50:33 AM 258 Views
I actually preferred the Jewel in Staite's pants. But to each his own I guess. *NM* - 21/06/2010 09:39:47 AM 234 Views
I'm with ya! *NM* - 21/06/2010 09:42:21 PM 243 Views
Not really - 21/06/2010 03:45:12 PM 573 Views
Re: In the long run, Nathan Fillion's butt had more potential. - 23/06/2010 07:26:06 AM 515 Views
That would be the entire Joss Whedon corpus in a nutshell. *NM* - 23/06/2010 07:46:32 AM 205 Views

Reply to Message