Active Users:1106 Time:23/11/2024 01:59:35 AM
Rebuttal mick Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM
Avatar is the only- ONLY- movie I've seen where the 3D was done beautifully and organically.

...

In Avatar, the picture had depth. You were looking in, instead of the picture coming out.

...


I took my 3D glasses off several times in Avatar and I didn't notice a difference (Yes, I'm sure I saw the 3D version). In Charlotte, NC there is an amusement park formerly known as Carowinds (it was sold a few years ago and I don't know if it changed names). They had a REAL 3D ride called "The 7th Portal" (or something like that). When they said 3D they MEANT it with that. These movies that are promoting 3D just have you put on glasses that hurt your eyes and they make the background just a LITTLE bit 3D. Unless there's shit flying off the screen making me duck in my seat I don't see the point of calling it 3D. I want to see a movie that makes me think I'm actually gonna get hit with debris when something gets blown to hell.


If I see a film in 3d I don't want things jumping out at me, they did that in the 80's and I find it a gratuitous way to use the effects.

I also saw the depth of every shot in Avatar as its attraction rather than adhoc crap coming at me when it suits the scene
Reply to message
3D films - The real deals and fakers of the next months - 03/06/2010 09:58:28 PM 871 Views
I still haven't seen a single 3D film -- real or otherwise - 03/06/2010 11:29:22 PM 540 Views
Me neither. - 03/06/2010 11:59:27 PM 499 Views
You left out Piranha 3-D. - 03/06/2010 11:53:03 PM 480 Views
3-D what? - 05/06/2010 01:33:26 AM 461 Views
Was Goblet of Fire shot in 3D? - 04/06/2010 12:51:04 AM 499 Views
There's a difference between a movie in 3D, and a 3D movie - 04/06/2010 01:31:28 AM 455 Views
I have to disagree. - 04/06/2010 02:28:52 AM 474 Views
Rebuttal - 04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM 563 Views
I guess it's just a matter of opinion. - 04/06/2010 03:53:22 AM 529 Views
Oh, they definitely are. I think our (or at least, my) is that Avatar did something new - 04/06/2010 05:38:48 AM 509 Views
Yes - 04/06/2010 08:52:00 AM 499 Views
Two points: - 04/06/2010 05:34:21 AM 581 Views
Re: Two points: - 07/06/2010 02:32:03 AM 395 Views
I haven't seen anything in 3D since 3rd Rock From the Sun had an episode. - 04/06/2010 02:54:15 AM 470 Views
Interesting. I thought I was the only one who didn't care about 3-D. - 04/06/2010 03:12:35 AM 502 Views
*throws tp all over your house, bushes and trees* *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:26:12 AM 180 Views
I don't care for the In your face-effects... - 04/06/2010 08:58:30 AM 505 Views
Harry Potter? Seriously? - 04/06/2010 05:16:40 AM 441 Views
3D is terrible and needs to die in a fire. - 04/06/2010 06:13:40 AM 577 Views
Absolutely. *NM* - 04/06/2010 09:35:35 AM 166 Views
Then just don't go *shrugs* - 04/06/2010 10:13:45 AM 507 Views
with Avatar, it made the CG more realistic IMO - 04/06/2010 07:37:13 PM 560 Views
That's because you were watching a 3D movie without 3D glasses. - 04/06/2010 11:36:47 PM 514 Views
I agree! *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:41:56 PM 162 Views
I want Mike Leigh and Ken Loach to make 3D films. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:39:51 PM 221 Views
I haven't watched anything in 3D since Captain EO. - 04/06/2010 05:15:11 PM 639 Views
I don't know about 3D - 05/06/2010 01:48:12 AM 454 Views
I try to only see the films made for 3D in a 3D theater. - 05/06/2010 08:40:37 PM 431 Views
Legend of the Guardians actually looks gorgeous. *NM* - 06/06/2010 07:48:09 PM 172 Views
I hate 3D. It makes my eyes hurt. - 07/06/2010 04:13:16 AM 446 Views
I enjoyed Shrek Forever After immensely. - 07/06/2010 09:10:27 AM 523 Views

Reply to Message