Active Users:1147 Time:23/11/2024 05:15:08 AM
Its not as simple as that, if you know what happened to it. mick Send a noteboard - 12/05/2010 05:46:18 AM

Not showing the 2 hour premier which explained everything first, not staying in the same schedule, not knowing how to advertise to show in the first place meant that most people never got the chance to see it. some of those who did catch it couldn't find it the next week.

One thing that is true is that if it wasn't for Firefly failing and the response it got then Chuck would have not gotten its next series.

Reply to message
I just finished Firefly, and I have to say... - 11/05/2010 10:06:15 PM 854 Views
I know! - 11/05/2010 10:12:22 PM 512 Views
I've seen Serenity 3 times - 11/05/2010 10:14:50 PM 523 Views
Re: I've seen Serenity 3 times - 11/05/2010 10:16:06 PM 505 Views
Re: I've seen Serenity 3 times - 11/05/2010 10:18:37 PM 502 Views
The only Whedon programme I've ever liked. - 11/05/2010 10:36:32 PM 550 Views
Same *NM* - 12/05/2010 10:22:44 AM 205 Views
word. - 11/05/2010 10:53:30 PM 513 Views
Because not enough people watched it. It wasn't popular. The end. *NM* - 11/05/2010 10:54:34 PM 206 Views
Its not as simple as that, if you know what happened to it. - 12/05/2010 05:46:18 AM 556 Views
I never even heard of it until after it was cancled - 12/05/2010 07:58:49 PM 484 Views
As Wibble said... - 12/05/2010 12:43:49 AM 513 Views
Sounds like you didn't watch it when it aired. - 12/05/2010 02:52:32 AM 493 Views
Maybe it was for the best. - 12/05/2010 04:02:48 AM 541 Views
That's true, though *NM* - 12/05/2010 10:24:46 AM 203 Views
If firefly continued then we wouldnt have Castle *NM* - 12/05/2010 04:57:21 AM 201 Views
Not true. - 12/05/2010 03:44:19 PM 475 Views
ok...i see...well im sorry you folks didnt get more firefly..i have never seen it so whatever.... *NM* - 13/05/2010 09:14:32 PM 182 Views
You should - 13/05/2010 09:43:28 PM 494 Views
Castle is basically Mal (although Mal's a bit less... um...) - 13/05/2010 11:24:00 PM 468 Views
Re: Castle is basically Mal (although Mal's a bit less... um...) - 13/05/2010 11:25:20 PM 481 Views
Re: Um, no. Mal and Castle are both basically Nathan Fillion, - 13/05/2010 11:47:51 PM 490 Views
Re: Um, no. Mal and Castle are both basically Nathan Fillion, - 13/05/2010 11:50:28 PM 456 Views
Re: Good wordbuilding, funny dialogue and acting do not an original plot make. - 12/05/2010 08:17:37 PM 529 Views
Re: Good wordbuilding, funny dialogue and acting do not an original plot make. - 13/05/2010 09:45:02 PM 488 Views
Re: It was wrong when Xander and Cordy did it too. - 13/05/2010 10:21:35 PM 516 Views
Re: It was wrong when Xander and Cordy did it too. - 13/05/2010 10:24:42 PM 527 Views
Really? I'd always thought they had an odd sexual tension about them. - 14/05/2010 12:15:57 AM 478 Views

Reply to Message