I don't blame Sawyer for Sayid, Jin, Sun, and Frank's deaths in the same way I don't blame Jack for Juliet's death. Doing so would be ridiculous. Sawyer, the penultimate con man, got conned by the ultimate con man. UnLocke played him like a drum, acting friendly enough for Sawyer to think HE had the upper hand (not to mention wearing the face of man Sawyer considered a coward, prejudicing Sawyer ever so subtly) to being sufficiently UNtrustworthy that Sawyer was bound to mistrust him and try to keep him off the sub. I don't blame Sawyer for not being willing to believe Jack. Sawyer wasn't there for the whole Richard fiasco on the Black Rock (incidentally, too bad Hurley didn't speak up, but again, it was CRAZY time).
So what, then is the alternative to being "conned" by Smokelocke? Certainly Sawyer never trusted him, and all he wanted to do was get away from him. This is one of those cases where, after the fact, you look at it and say "The good guys should have taken more precautions against the bad guy's out-of-left-field gambit" when there is nothing that could have been foreseen at the time. Except for Jack carrying the backpack on board, not to mention blindly accepting it from Smokelocke, the plan would have worked. The only way Sawyer underestimated Smokelocke was in not figuring out the mystical rules by which he had to kill them. Barring Jack getting on the submarine, which was NOT part of Sawyer's plan (Sawyer designated Jack to keep Locke behind because Jack intended to stay). When you get right down to it, Locke was the one who got lucky. Did he plan for Kate to get wounded (not killed) and Jack to change his mind at the last second and carry Locke's bomb onto the sub? What was his plan if everything went the way Sawyer wanted, and they all got safely to the sub? Get in with them and wave goodbye to Jack standing there on the dock with a bomb that (according to Jack) wasn't going to go off? The elements that made his plan work were strokes of luck over which he had no control, unless he had some sort of faith that "the island" would make them all get on together, and provide him with a plausible excuse to stay. But how was Jack a jerk in this episode? He fell for the same manipulation. Wearing Locke's face, UnLocke gives the impression that you can beat him, and Jack, a recovering controlling freak, is thereby easy to deceive. And what's with this idea that Jack should have sent Kate down the sub with Claire?! She's the love of his life and she is dying from a gunshot wound, and JACK IS A DOCTOR. Of course he went on board. Would you trust a bleeding, dying Kate to CLAIRE of all people?
Except Jack was now supposed ot be all about faith. He has faith that they are supposed to stay on the island and that it is necessary to keep Locke there. He had faith that the bomb wouldn't go off, because Locke isn't "allowed" to kill them. Where was his faith when it counted? If he had stuck to his guns, he would have let the others take Kate and have faith that he was doing the right thing by staying on the island. And it's not as if Claire is all that incompetant, surviving on her own for three years, or the only person with Kate! In what way is a woman hardened by three years of surviving in a jungle incapable of carrying a small skinny woman down a ladder? Once on the sub, with another guy who cares for her and a couple of other competant people, her odds were pretty good. It is not like Jack's being a doctor makes him a Final Fantasy White Mage - he needs tools and supplies and whatnot the same as anyone else. I am fairly certain a vetern soldier is competant to keep her from dying of a shoulder wound until they can reach safety. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if (a) Jack intended to (argue in favor of) resurface once they were out of Locke's range and
Yes, a fat lot of good that would do, since it would be in the middle of the ocean. (b) the 'Widmore' men shooting from behind the trees were really UnLocke's followers. Yes, I knew right away when UnLocke put the backpack on Jack that there was C4 inside. A real 'duh, Jack' moment. But jerk? I really don't see it. He and Sawyer got conned by the Essence of Evil.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Lost 6.14: The candidate *spoilers*
05/05/2010 09:01:43 AM
- 1010 Views
Summary of "Across the sea" sneak peak
05/05/2010 10:30:45 AM
- 556 Views
Re: Summary of "Across the sea" sneak peak
05/05/2010 06:28:55 PM
- 659 Views
Re: Summary of "Across the sea" sneak peak
05/05/2010 07:55:33 PM
- 595 Views
Re: Summary of "Across the sea" sneak peak
07/05/2010 04:24:20 PM
- 724 Views
BTW, in the Sideline, Rose & Bernard ARE married. She's "Rose Nadler" when placing Locke
12/05/2010 06:53:32 AM
- 546 Views
Terrific episode!
05/05/2010 04:11:06 PM
- 609 Views
I thought Locke planted the bomb on the plane.
06/05/2010 05:45:52 AM
- 550 Views
It is supicous that he ripped the watch off of the guards body before entering the plane *NM*
06/05/2010 10:21:15 AM
- 235 Views
I am not handling this business of
05/05/2010 08:20:46 PM
- 671 Views
No. Way. Just, no way.
06/05/2010 03:11:22 AM
- 564 Views
We didn't actually *see* Frank die, so there's a good chance he'll... uh, resurface. *NM*
06/05/2010 04:21:12 AM
- 228 Views
I am glad the show is ending and Jack is not the next Jacob IMHO.
06/05/2010 03:58:21 AM
- 501 Views
A few things i noticed.
06/05/2010 05:31:06 AM
- 566 Views
You're laying this one on SAWYER? Jack & Jin were the episode's jerks.
06/05/2010 02:31:37 PM
- 562 Views
Jerks? Um, no. Fools, yes.
07/05/2010 03:20:00 AM
- 586 Views
Re: Jerks? Um, no. Fools, yes.
08/05/2010 12:19:32 PM
- 593 Views
Re: You're laying this one on SAWYER? Jack & Jin were the episode's jerks.
07/05/2010 01:43:35 PM
- 564 Views