Active Users:1101 Time:22/11/2024 12:54:08 PM
Well, that answered the question about what the Doctor was shooting. snoopcester Send a noteboard - 26/04/2010 11:20:01 AM
That was good. It is pretty much what I have been waiting for from Moffat. Of course, I hate him deeply for making it a two-parter and leaving me in agonising fear of angels and statues and basically blinking for a whole week. But I liked it.


The Angels are excellent and they are being used at about the right amount, so they don't feel over used like the Daleks are. They need to come up with a few more baddies of a similar calibre to stop them needing the Daleks. I also like multi-part episodes, when well done like this one seems to be.
It was interesting to see more about how the Angels work as well, even if the bit with Bob felt a bit too much like the Library episode repeated. I like the thing with their images though and the effect of looking at the eyes had on Amy.

I was not as enthusiastic about Alex Kingston this time (compared to Silence in the Library). She seems to have only one setting. I would have liked her to be somewhat subtler. But I may be wrong. I AM glad River Song is finally reintroduced. And I like how Moffat put two of his major creations together (ie scary as hell Angels and Doctor's mystery future something-or-other).


It is nice to see her reappear but yes, she did seem a bit more narrow ranged - I wonder if it is a deliberate thing or just poor writing in an attempt to give her a big impact as the centre of attention?

I wonder what it is she has done, which the priest does not think the Doctor would like to hear. Has she killed someone?


Well she has clearly spent time with the Doctor at some point in his future and flown the Tardis - my guess is she probably did something he felt was against the rules. Messing with time somehow seems most likely to me currently, perhaps to save his life.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
/Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 24/04/2010 07:53:37 PM 689 Views
Amy is growing on me. - 24/04/2010 08:19:43 PM 575 Views
Re: Amy is growing on me. - 24/04/2010 08:21:44 PM 555 Views
She seems as if she believes everything she says to be highly witty. - 24/04/2010 08:23:51 PM 555 Views
Started well, ended badly - 24/04/2010 08:21:14 PM 480 Views
Re: Started well, ended badly - 24/04/2010 08:22:50 PM 528 Views
I liked that one. - 25/04/2010 03:26:26 AM 584 Views
Re: I liked that one. - 25/04/2010 10:04:05 AM 584 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 25/04/2010 03:31:03 PM 561 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 25/04/2010 03:35:59 PM 496 Views
That episode was well terrifying. - 25/04/2010 11:44:35 PM 697 Views
Re: That episode was well terrifying. - 26/04/2010 09:13:45 AM 531 Views
I'm a much happier bunny this week - 26/04/2010 10:12:55 AM 626 Views
Re: I'm a much happier bunny this week - 26/04/2010 10:19:21 AM 609 Views
Well, that answered the question about what the Doctor was shooting. - 26/04/2010 11:20:01 AM 501 Views
True. And satisfactorily. - 26/04/2010 05:19:12 PM 555 Views
And roughly as I suggested - 26/04/2010 05:24:41 PM 480 Views
Re: And roughly as I suggested - 26/04/2010 05:27:07 PM 483 Views
It was good. - 26/04/2010 01:48:27 PM 492 Views
Re: It was good. - 26/04/2010 05:19:50 PM 483 Views
Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:36:30 PM 626 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:41:51 PM 475 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:51:24 PM 613 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:55:29 PM 526 Views
Just caught it online. - 30/04/2010 04:18:52 AM 434 Views
Re: Just caught it online. - 30/04/2010 08:04:24 AM 507 Views

Reply to Message