Active Users:906 Time:22/11/2024 12:17:42 PM
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* Camilla Send a noteboard - 25/04/2010 03:35:59 PM
It was okay, but in a few places it felt like a re-working of the silence in the library scenario - understandable given Moffat's role in both. But the Angel using Bob's voice sounded like a straight out rip off, and a little lazy. Soldiers/Priests substituted for scientists in the library story, a building that has been empty for 4 hundred years seemed like other aspects from the library template. And the River Song character wasn't as enjoyable second time round. (I don't know why.)


I found it to be a bit of a hybrid of Silence in the Library, Blink (obviously) and the Empty Child, all together. I don't remember why it reminded me of the latter, but it struck me.

I agree about River Song. I watched the library episodes afterwards, and she really is more subtle and acts with a wider range in the older episodes. I don't know why. Maybe there was a better director?

The Doctor and Amy are starting to bond well, and I am seeing Matt Smith as the Doctor in his own right, and his own character. Still, it was much better than last weeks Dalek story.

PS Still not sure where they are going with the glowing wound that is unsubtely seen in every episode.


It looks like something will happen with that in the next episode. It might explain the weird discrepancy between real time and what we have seen before. And possibly also the oddity of River Song showing up only after the Doctor has regenerated.

If the universe has cracks, it could conceivably be due to something the Doctor did in his semi-mad period, if he failed to respect something that was a fixed point in time for example. I don't know. I am very intrigued.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
/Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 24/04/2010 07:53:37 PM 687 Views
Amy is growing on me. - 24/04/2010 08:19:43 PM 573 Views
Re: Amy is growing on me. - 24/04/2010 08:21:44 PM 555 Views
She seems as if she believes everything she says to be highly witty. - 24/04/2010 08:23:51 PM 553 Views
Started well, ended badly - 24/04/2010 08:21:14 PM 478 Views
Re: Started well, ended badly - 24/04/2010 08:22:50 PM 528 Views
I liked that one. - 25/04/2010 03:26:26 AM 582 Views
Re: I liked that one. - 25/04/2010 10:04:05 AM 583 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 25/04/2010 03:31:03 PM 560 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 25/04/2010 03:35:59 PM 495 Views
That episode was well terrifying. - 25/04/2010 11:44:35 PM 697 Views
Re: That episode was well terrifying. - 26/04/2010 09:13:45 AM 531 Views
I'm a much happier bunny this week - 26/04/2010 10:12:55 AM 626 Views
Re: I'm a much happier bunny this week - 26/04/2010 10:19:21 AM 607 Views
Well, that answered the question about what the Doctor was shooting. - 26/04/2010 11:20:01 AM 499 Views
True. And satisfactorily. - 26/04/2010 05:19:12 PM 555 Views
And roughly as I suggested - 26/04/2010 05:24:41 PM 480 Views
Re: And roughly as I suggested - 26/04/2010 05:27:07 PM 483 Views
It was good. - 26/04/2010 01:48:27 PM 491 Views
Re: It was good. - 26/04/2010 05:19:50 PM 481 Views
Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:36:30 PM 626 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:41:51 PM 473 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:51:24 PM 611 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:55:29 PM 525 Views
Just caught it online. - 30/04/2010 04:18:52 AM 433 Views
Re: Just caught it online. - 30/04/2010 08:04:24 AM 506 Views

Reply to Message