The case against me seems really really strange. Here the string of events through my eyes:
- Artsapat votes for me
- I defend myself by presenting the enormous amount of assumptions he uses to deduct my presumed guilt.
- Beetnemesis votes for me because he doesn't know my role. I don't have any clue why my role is more important than for example his own or of any other player, but that's the reason he votes for me.
We only know the characters of 2 players (Yunalesca and Ranagrande)and it's a mystery to me why I should have to role - and characterclaim. The case against me is very slim and so I see no reason why I should reveal more about my role nor character than any other.
On the other hand, the ferocity of Artsapat's 'deduction' and the alacrity of Beet in joining the vote (without good argumentation) makes me suspect there is more behind it than mere 'getting the game forward'.
Rana's vote I do understand, as his head is on the block too. I don't see why the Bursar of all people should be a Survivor, but I can't see him als particular malevolent too. Hence my no-voting for him.