I suggested to start the game again, now that we've seen the event resolution, with the people who claim they can win without voting. This really intrigues me, and as was pointed out by others: it's curious that so many / more than 1 claim this.
On the contrary, I don't claim a non-killing role. <a href="http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/281293/">Bergioyn doesn't say</a>, but his surprise at the type of game that would require no killing leads me to suspect he's not. Yunalesca is a Vampire, not a likely one for a Survivor, and definetely not for a no-killing role. (Didn't she already claim somewhere that she needed to kill? Can't find it anymore.) Maybe, since she's a reporter in-world, an ivestigative role. (Which makes me wonder: why wasn't she targeted/killed last night? <a href="http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/281594/">She herself said she wasn't.</a> Beet also wanted to know more, and he suggested one option (will discuss below) which makes me feel he also doesn't claim no need to kill to win.
So are you claiming to be a killing role? Or that you need to kill people to win? Also, Yuna claimed to not have an NK ability. That doesn't say anything about her victory conditions, however.
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/281493/
What kind of roles can you have to win without Lynching or voting? beet made a rather intruiging suggestion, that besides a Survivor, a Cultist also can win without voting. Any more suggestions?
I don't know why you assume it's necessarily a town attribute. It could just as well be a mafia one, requiring elimination of the town, or in this case, perhaps a specific race or group or whatever.
As for there being Cultists, they would still have a condition that requires them to eliminate threats to the cult (mafia), since mafia usually can't be recruited to a cult.
Odd logic. FT was the first one who made the claim that he didn't need to kill/eliminate anyone. Rana actually challenged that claim. I and then Taiga echoed FT's sentiments and after all that, Rana ended up backing off and then basically agreeing with both of us. He wasn't the first to make this claim by any means...
No, I was not visited by a zombie, I just saw him in the street. ? also saw him but was not visited. I don't know what happened to him or what his significance is, but he seems to have disappeared.
Hm, are you saying he sent the zombie to someone's house? That's interesting, but who could do that?
I'd also like to know what that means, as I haven't read DW.
I don't know the lore, but Stephen's role (a vampire) clearly wasn't a cultist. As Bergoiyn mentioned, zombies in DW don't multiply that way. There could still be a cult, but I don't think the undead would be involved. Instead, we have evidence of "pamphlets speak of a distant god named Om" (Day 1 intro) that sound much more likely to be Cult suspects.
Vote: Taiga.
I would like to know if you think Taiga sent the zombie. Is that why you are voting him? It's not something I thought of, I'll have to go back and read that context again.