Your answer about the event's resolution was entertaining enough, but also obviously partly a joke. Can you please clarify which parts are true, and which parts are (deliberately?) obfuscating things?
You say that the head was caved in with a bag of marbles. This at least is confirmed by both others (Berg and FT) who say they stayed at the crime scene.
Then you go on a tangent about why the Hippos are "obviously" involved (which I now agree with now, seeing the confirmed pamphlet - see my reply to FT above), because hippos are "hungry hungry" (?).
You then make a statement about Dwarfs being hoarders. Where does that come from? Do you have info that Bailey was a Dwarf? Or are you now talking about the first murder again? Was his head also then bashed in with marbles, instead of with a ram as we were assuming until now? Is that what you're saying?
"All" the marbles? As in: "all marbles available in the city"? And are you now implying this was a robbery gone bad? But then you imply the Hippos will get their hands on some more, since they "are like crack".
Not to mention the whole part about "we now have roleblocking abilities". I can't even process the final few lines anymore.
I assume you were joking around for at least some, if not most, of this. And I appreciate the jokes and the humor (you know I do). But for the sake of clarity: can you tell us which parts were jokes, and which parts are what you really wanted to share.
The question of whether you intentionally tried to muddle the discussion by adding elements about Trolls, Dwarfs and Diamond Cutters is open to the floor. (And your defense)