Obviously, beetnemesis was correct back on Day 1 when he hypothesized that this was a multi-faction game. I think it's time to test his other claim: that Isaac is guilty. I did think it was odd that Isaac put so much emphasis on the bussing/bandwagon thing during beet's lynch, but, well, it was Day 1.

Then yesterday, when we did name claims (which it looks like lots of people lied about...) when I mentioned suspicion of Sacrilicious Toast, Isaac was the one to defend Lavender Biggs.

Also, in his first analysis table of those names, Isaac used an incorrect order to place suspicion on Fox and Ravens and me, and again to protect Sacrilicious Toast. It is entirely possible that that was an honest mistake. It's also possible that it wasn't; that wouldn't be the first time Isaac has misrepresented data for the good of his team.

Now, look at last night. We had three scum die and we are told that two of them killed each other. So who was responsible for the third kill?

Looking at the names of the deceased, we have three Italians, two English/Americans, two Japanese, and one Russian.

It would make sense for the mafias to be of equal size, so we need another Japanese mafioso. Based on Isaac's protection of ST, and on whatever extra knowledge beetnemesis withheld even unto death, I think Isaac is the most likely candidate.

If Yunalesca was a serial killer, this lynch should bring the town to victory. I sincerely hope that is the case, because otherwise Hobo and Fanatic-Templar are both members of the Russian mafia and I have already lost this game.

So to reiterate:

Vote: Isaac