C seems to be our leading candidate right now, some support for A and B (and F of course, we obviously all like F) and both B and C require that attrition list, so we may as well come up with Criteria. I think we need 5 or more of these, and I think its vital that we not discuss who is on it until we have a list. So we need suggestions, and we need to pick over the phrasing and method for determination. I would say that the loose criteria for selecting these criteria is that the players on the top of the list have taken actions which if townie indicating an active and/or skilled attempt to help the town. We all know posting a lot does not in of itself indicate someone is town, but rather we know posting very little does not help the town. So keep that in mind for criteria suggestions.

Our two usual obvious ones are always 'post count' and 'non-NM post count', so I'll throw those on as automatics, they're also easier to figure out and not something we can really dispute like 'useful question'.

Confirmed Criteria
Post Count
Non-NM Post Count

Suggested Criteria
Has not suggested any questions, expanding to 'has not suggested any questions that were used'

Has said something, or suggested something, which was a really bad idea if pursued (Extreme example: "Hey, the doc should role claim" ) or done something usually regarded as somewhat anti-town like claiming vanilla.

Answered questions later than most

Has a bad track record of voting for townies when they were a townie

Has a bad track record of under-utilizing a role power when they had it.

Note that I'm not specifically endorsing those suggestions up there at the moment and they are there more for examples to get the brain juices flowing, don't worry if it might produce a bad result for a given case, we're not agreeing to shut our brains off and blindly lynch someone if they have an obvious and excusable reason for showing up on the list. Note the common theme though, I don't really like the very last one, but all things being equal I'd rather keep a player who made good decision when a doc then one who dropped four townies when a vig, and the reason I don't really like it as a question is because there's a lot of randomness factoring into whether or not something is regarded in hindsight as a good move, but it's a gauge that would indicate that if someone had a role this game they'd be likely to make good use of it, and that's a good reason to keep them around.