I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well
ranagrande Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:41:14 AM
Eddington himself revised his estimate multiple times. His original claim really doesn't have any scientific value. However, it should serve extremely well as an arbitrarily large number to use in this game of strategy.
Although I tend to agree, I must say that increasing the size of the known universe does not necessarily demand an increase in the total number of protons. The universe is, after all, primarily composed of empty space. Besides, it is still possible that objects and phenomena at the extreme ranges of our perception may actually be comprised of anti-protons instead.
That would work too, except that the whole point was to mix things up a little.
I think it will be interesting to see what effect, if any, this will have on the betting.
Welcome
Even if I accepted Eddington's absurd number guess on that it ignores that the Observable Universe's edge is expanding to show new areas of space constantly that were previously unavailable to sight by the Universe's low age.
Although I tend to agree, I must say that increasing the size of the known universe does not necessarily demand an increase in the total number of protons. The universe is, after all, primarily composed of empty space. Besides, it is still possible that objects and phenomena at the extreme ranges of our perception may actually be comprised of anti-protons instead.
I also feel obliged to point out that 136x2^256 might be better utilized for play purposes as a constant, which I shall name "COIN" where 1 coin is equal to approximately 0.001x136x2^256, and thus for game play purposes we would have 1000 of these "COINs"
That would work too, except that the whole point was to mix things up a little.
I think it will be interesting to see what effect, if any, this will have on the betting.
But yeah, I'm in
Welcome
Coin Game V
30/11/2010 11:45:31 PM
- 2354 Views
I'm a little confused(as usual)
30/11/2010 11:50:06 PM
- 1136 Views
It's the same basic system as before. You'll just have a few more coins to play with. *NM*
01/12/2010 01:25:39 AM
- 650 Views
I object to your outdated usage of proton count
01/12/2010 01:18:29 AM
- 1150 Views
I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well
01/12/2010 01:41:14 AM
- 1256 Views
Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well
01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM
- 1367 Views
People are free to submit their entries in any format they desire
01/12/2010 02:40:21 AM
- 1216 Views
So if I bet negative, assuming I'm not the lowest, do I earn coins?
01/12/2010 04:23:11 AM
- 1134 Views
Round 2!
04/12/2010 05:30:41 PM
- 1234 Views
I had no idea what I was doing and I won!! AHAHAHAHhehehehehe.... *NM*
04/12/2010 07:44:35 PM
- 756 Views
04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM
- 1076 Views
Against a force such as this, there can be no victory. *NM*
05/12/2010 06:30:15 AM
- 674 Views
We must join with him. It would be wise, my friend. *NM*
05/12/2010 07:38:53 AM
- 724 Views
Tell me, friend, when did you abandon reason for madness?? *NM*
05/12/2010 02:45:35 PM
- 691 Views
I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly, but you have elected the way of pain. *NM*
07/12/2010 02:59:35 AM
- 685 Views
Yes, I did not expect you to show wisdom, even on your own behalf;
07/12/2010 06:48:17 PM
- 934 Views
I am ashamed to admit I cannot produce the appropriate response to this.
07/12/2010 08:05:27 PM
- 1095 Views
So, a serious question about my nerd-cred.
08/12/2010 06:00:05 AM
- 1112 Views
Round 3!
06/12/2010 07:48:56 PM
- 1166 Views
Kronin's bid was gibberish and higher too
06/12/2010 09:13:08 PM
- 1231 Views
I of course meant them all in their most popular incarnations. *NM*
07/12/2010 04:44:02 AM
- 703 Views
Round 7!
15/12/2010 05:13:52 AM
- 1138 Views
Way to be a jerk, Gher. *NM*
15/12/2010 05:19:15 AM
- 651 Views
I thought it was easy enough to work with. A jerk would put down a equation...
15/12/2010 04:10:52 PM
- 938 Views
The End
18/12/2010 07:07:18 PM
- 1210 Views
I was expecting second place again, the win's nice *NM*
18/12/2010 07:52:40 PM
- 622 Views