I think it did not but not sure, it wasn't the same as VOTF, which was a statement of intent to murder people who kept targeting high profile characters to prevent the game from being a night magnet, that had an escape clause for reasonable suspicion from in game action and wasn't limited to night 1, and that's in the Mad Muad post game, but that applies to all players. Our arrangement was sometime during Day 1 of Paradise Hotel, I'll try to dig up the link tomorrow but its pretty late now for me. We can change or adopt those terms if you want, but I'd appreciate if "Isaac mentions no lynch" or "Isaac starts a lynch that ends in townie" be explicitly exempted as reasons, since its a fairly worthless pact when I'm pretty certain I've started every single Day 1 lynch in every game I've been in,all the scummer occassions have ended with townies and most of the townie occassions too. LEt me think - Game 2, town, scummer died, game 3, town, townie died, 5, town, townie died, 6 town, no lynch, 11 - Tower, town, scummer lynched, 12 - crossover, town, scummer lynched, last game, town, townie died. So all scummer a townie died, 7 townie and 3 scum, 3 town, one no lynch. Yeah, I think realistically no pact would be fair where such an escape clause was in play. I don't think our current one has any, but again, if it does, or if you want to make it say that, I need some assurances only reasonable suspicion would qualify.



I'm totally not surprised