Mason groups are not threats to the mafia right? So would those of the mason group come forward? I doubt that would make them(you) a target of the Mafia assuming the Mafia has a better person to kill.
They can be, if one of them has an investigatory role, masons aren't always vanilla, its sort of small add-on, I think in my 'modding suggestions' document I even list them as having an effective role value of 0
If you don't want to come forward I can see why. When I revealed I was a mason it almost got me lynched so...
Right, keep in mind I went into last night convinced there were multiple mason groups and that at least one, if not all, would have an enemy agent in them, last night I got some fairly decent reasons not to be quite so wary of my allies, so that left you. I'm very leery of discussing anything around them for additional reasons too, I'll probably have to divulge all of that to stay alive but before I do I'd really like to know if I'm already dead, there are limits as too how much damage I'm willing to do to stay alive, keep in mind I'd been pondering claiming mason for some time now, and decided it was too dangerous at this stage.
Yeah I don't even know...
Wow this message contains nothing...
Well let me add to it As a mason on day 1, you knew who your ally was, on the character claims table, and that his other three were fake, I knew that for two of the other players, and I'd come to suspect there was at least one more mason group, I'd guessed yours and was fairly sure fist was in it, or that he was spiderman, which made me unsure about Yuna, but I figured on "Avengers" not just a two man twin group. Superhero teams - I still think we might have another mason group out there besides yours and mine. I'm sure if people look back on day 1 they'll see I was fishing for that and they'll see, as one of my teammates did, why WF stuck out even more to me. FT says I was ignoring the scum, this isn't really the case, I was looking for them, looking very hard, but I was looking for mason teams, and its not really something I could put out. If I could see some movement between players who shared character claims that were on teams, I could figure out those teams. MY initial belief was that everyone or nearly everyone was superhero teams and the bad guys were dopplegangers on those teams, and I was able to eliminate a lot claims that way. But WF couldn't be on a team, no one works with Deadpool, another thing which made him stand out to me, and I scrambled my own character claims to ensure most of my fakes was also a team member of a major well-known team, I didn't want anyone else, if my 3-4 infected mason groups theory held, to be able to figure it out on day 1, they'd know, if it was true, on day 2, and their behavior might be a tell.
People rarely realize this but many scummers or masons act very differently on day 1 to day 2, they find out info at night they didn't previously know. Like if I'm a scum leader, I might find out one of my allies can RB or is immune to investigation etc, changes my whole game plan.
The day wasn't really about killing WF, I did want him dead because I thought it he was a SK, all evidence pointed that way, public and my own personal info, but I never saw the lynch coming down that quick, three hours, but that made me think 'team vote'
Look at who voted so far for both, Yunalesca, Amys and Kronin, its not hard of Yunalesca who listed two DC comic characters for hers, a major character's girlfriend, and a member of the X-men - two of those other votes, Amys and DK, both have listed other X-men as character claims and both listed unlikely characters for at leas tone of their claims - Namor, normally a villain, and Squirrel Girl, one of WF's claims and as mentioned, a minor character who I've discussed yesterday. FT didn't see any moves by me against the scum because there was no chance, the vote happened too quickly, it did it off a comment I'd made when I decided a lynch of WF was becoming improbable too, I thought people would go for semi-random, start removing people from the list, and that some of those might be mason teammates, or if the heavily infiltrated mason theory was true, I might spot a scummer by seeing who removed someone who couldn't be on their team. That never happened, but it was a workable plan, I really was doing something against the scummers I just never got the chance.
After brief discussion with my allies come the night, which they can back me up on or out me if I lie, I'd come to believe the X-men had bandwagoned WF, it didn't entirely fit though since I was sure FT was Wolverine, a X-man, and a principle rival of Deadpool who notoriously can sniff out shapeshifters. I thought maybe that was the reason he wasn't going for deadpool but it didn't make sense because the SK idea didn't revolve around him being a skrull, the exact opposite, I even tried to pitch that idea at FT on day 1 but he either missed it or didn't accept it. It also could only make sense if FT has prior to start info, but he could have had that because I did, or think I do. I fished that out at my allies last night, figuring they'd either tell me there info or try to fake it if scum, nothing happened. That and some other factors made me doubt they could be scum, even though we were the most obvious group to be infected.
There's a lot more to this but it involves my team, I'd feel better if they came out voluntarily but if they think its too dangerous, I'll understand why, if they are clean, one of them will be at least. A great deal more of this makes sense with that info but I don't think we're all vanilla masons. I might as well put that out too, I also picked a shared characteristic besides team member for my claims - they're all "Will survive hit by tank shell' sorts, I have some NK-resistance, not total, which was another reason a SK worried me, nobody claimed a legit vig character and I had NK-resistance, and it fit so many other claims well, so if you throw in a clear NKer - Deadpool - well in a fairly small game like this it makes sense to spread some NK protection around or the game goes to fast, 2 NKs a night plus a lynch can deplete players really quickly in a 13 players game. This also had to do with baiting my teammates, I figure done of them was probably scum so I dangled something - information, vital info I was afraid to divulge - this is actually true, but I figured if they reported that back to scummer HQ I'd be attacked, and it would probably fail, and I'd know... unsurprisingly when that didn't come I figured my teammates were either infection free, didn't take the bait, or had bigger fish to fry and understandably feared I might be docced... so a dead roled mason, fist, fit the 'bigger fish' pretty well.
Hope that clarifies, I think it will make even more sense if I can do a total unload but I'd feel better if one or both of my teammates came out first, and I won't expose them if I'm already dead. Trust me though, should that happen the move on Deadpool will make even more sense as will some other things. It also lets me play out one more card I think may actually flat out prove my innocence, but it also exposes my teammates.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
RAFO Mafia 19: Superlative Crisis! ISSUE TWO: BLACK MAGIC- WHOA, MAN!
03/11/2010 04:59:59 AM
- 2593 Views
I see two avenues to discuss here
03/11/2010 11:41:14 AM
- 816 Views
I was thinking about number 1.
03/11/2010 10:00:57 PM
- 827 Views
Regarding 2, and let me suggets a 3
04/11/2010 02:30:41 AM
- 884 Views
I, personally, agree with Isaac so here goes.
04/11/2010 11:33:07 PM
- 808 Views
O.......K..........
05/11/2010 11:43:14 PM
- 785 Views
Did Fist use his power last Night?
06/11/2010 03:41:05 AM
- 823 Views
It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 04:53:19 AM
- 811 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 05:30:00 PM
- 796 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 07:15:11 PM
- 845 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 08:18:16 AM
- 893 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 03:38:37 PM
- 846 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 06:42:10 PM
- 883 Views
Huh, well Fox straight up told us his Mason group was a 3rd Fraction on Night 1
11/11/2010 12:55:50 AM
- 845 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 06:16:29 PM
- 902 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 07:16:20 PM
- 839 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 09:29:12 PM
- 919 Views
I am about 95% sure that WF targeted me last Night.
11/11/2010 01:04:34 AM
- 811 Views
Interesting.
11/11/2010 02:25:07 AM
- 863 Views
It's certainly possible.
11/11/2010 02:39:00 AM
- 851 Views
Now I'm curious
11/11/2010 03:33:46 AM
- 891 Views
Presumably because I'm not trying to get her lynched.
11/11/2010 03:53:54 AM
- 890 Views
Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
04/11/2010 05:41:04 AM
- 885 Views
Re: Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
04/11/2010 04:18:17 PM
- 904 Views
a scummer got caught on day one in the tower game
04/11/2010 06:42:15 PM
- 871 Views
also there was that time someone said they saw a black light instead of white
04/11/2010 07:52:41 PM
- 876 Views
That was Hobo in DK's crossover game. *NM*
04/11/2010 08:16:07 PM
- 475 Views
You know we could just forget about that. I wouldn't complain. *NM*
05/11/2010 08:35:03 PM
- 519 Views
Hypocop? *NM*
03/11/2010 03:20:17 PM
- 527 Views
So help me I will spoil the entirety of ToM, people! (not just yet, though)
10/11/2010 02:51:46 AM
- 760 Views
I'm pretty sure if you do, you'll be lynched. *NM*
10/11/2010 09:19:43 PM
- 492 Views
Vote: No Lynch
13/11/2010 12:24:43 AM
- 863 Views
I am very much opposed to this idea
13/11/2010 02:04:27 PM
- 785 Views
Then offer an alternative
13/11/2010 11:10:42 PM
- 835 Views
Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
14/11/2010 04:03:35 AM
- 766 Views
Re: Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
14/11/2010 04:21:12 AM
- 849 Views
I had no RBIRL because my computer died.
14/11/2010 06:52:56 AM
- 745 Views
Ah, I see you did unvote. Very well. I still got my eye on you. *NM*
14/11/2010 06:55:30 AM
- 430 Views
LOL - I guess this is also my informal defense
14/11/2010 08:52:56 AM
- 835 Views
Saying it's not out-of-character to be scummy doesn't make you any less scummy.
14/11/2010 04:33:15 PM
- 864 Views
Watch the difference between what he says and what he is accused of.
14/11/2010 07:08:08 PM
- 723 Views
After this whole argument I've had with FT...
13/11/2010 11:42:32 PM
- 791 Views
People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
14/11/2010 03:43:14 AM
- 767 Views
Re: People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
14/11/2010 02:23:04 PM
- 939 Views
Vote: Isaac
13/11/2010 11:58:56 PM
- 879 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
14/11/2010 03:02:15 AM
- 783 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
14/11/2010 04:02:30 AM
- 868 Views
What was scummy?
14/11/2010 04:10:12 AM
- 896 Views
Re: What was scummy?
14/11/2010 05:41:44 AM
- 814 Views
Extrmely thin
14/11/2010 06:05:32 AM
- 971 Views
Actually...
14/11/2010 06:55:02 AM
- 873 Views
Re: Actually...
14/11/2010 07:44:33 AM
- 828 Views
Did you guys just blitz me?
14/11/2010 11:35:58 PM
- 858 Views
Your not hammered yet are you?
14/11/2010 11:46:29 PM
- 798 Views
I think I might be, can never be sure what votes are worth in a heavy role game
14/11/2010 11:50:51 PM
- 810 Views
I'm potentially alive on a technicality
15/11/2010 12:02:36 AM
- 715 Views
Why don't you go ahead and claim then?
15/11/2010 12:11:03 AM
- 804 Views
Sure
15/11/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 775 Views
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
15/11/2010 02:13:23 AM
- 877 Views
Well, let me shed a bit more light
15/11/2010 04:22:36 AM
- 839 Views
I think so.
15/11/2010 01:25:46 AM
- 784 Views
Also, I must confess...
15/11/2010 01:32:44 AM
- 794 Views
Re: Also, I must confess...
15/11/2010 01:58:26 AM
- 923 Views
Yes, I would expect so.
15/11/2010 02:22:06 AM
- 732 Views
Re: Yes, I would expect so.
15/11/2010 02:35:49 AM
- 840 Views
I'm unvoting only if the defence is really foolproof, since now no-one can hammer without instantly
15/11/2010 07:18:05 AM
- 818 Views
EBWOP - The "only" in the title is rebundant, it was part of different title I abandoned. *NM*
15/11/2010 07:19:46 AM
- 503 Views
I guess the first title stands afterall I won't automatically unvote just because none should hammer
15/11/2010 08:19:00 AM
- 726 Views
I'll try to help Isaac out a bit here.
15/11/2010 01:11:11 PM
- 688 Views
Thanks, and a question too
15/11/2010 01:30:17 PM
- 736 Views
Well, I'll unvote if the third mason comes forward too. *NM*
15/11/2010 03:30:36 PM
- 471 Views
Jeez, when it rains, it pours
15/11/2010 10:34:54 PM
- 700 Views
OK Isaac
15/11/2010 11:14:45 PM
- 760 Views
My Defense Posts
16/11/2010 04:16:41 AM
- 770 Views
Defense A: The Fantastic Four
16/11/2010 04:31:11 AM
- 793 Views
Defense B: The Numbers Game
16/11/2010 04:36:59 AM
- 797 Views
"What motive would a scummer have"?
16/11/2010 05:56:04 PM
- 772 Views
Without any further questions though?
16/11/2010 11:51:42 PM
- 826 Views
If you see an avalanche coming, you hop on board (NOT a metaphor).
17/11/2010 12:12:31 AM
- 757 Views
Defense C: The Intro Flavor
16/11/2010 04:41:31 AM
- 906 Views
Eh ...
16/11/2010 10:00:21 PM
- 751 Views
Re: Eh ...
17/11/2010 02:33:27 AM
- 815 Views
We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
16/11/2010 07:01:22 AM
- 858 Views
Re: We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
16/11/2010 01:40:21 PM
- 754 Views
Yes, that was it.
16/11/2010 09:05:04 PM
- 782 Views
Re: Yes, that was it.
17/11/2010 02:55:58 AM
- 801 Views
Not at all.
17/11/2010 03:04:50 AM
- 808 Views
Well, that's a borderline lie
17/11/2010 04:29:47 AM
- 860 Views
How do you figure?
17/11/2010 05:46:37 AM
- 759 Views
I'd say its pretty pertinent to my defense
17/11/2010 06:49:20 AM
- 749 Views
All right, fair enough.
17/11/2010 07:19:37 AM
- 875 Views
Thanks for whakcing me before going to bed
17/11/2010 07:39:58 AM
- 776 Views
By the way, I'd appreciate if no one had hammer till FT has a chance to reply and vice-versa
17/11/2010 07:46:18 AM
- 768 Views
I have evidence in favor of and yet against F-T's claim. Take it as you will.
17/11/2010 07:18:35 PM
- 847 Views
Slight EBWOP
17/11/2010 07:20:58 PM
- 851 Views
Re: Slight EBWOP
17/11/2010 07:24:34 PM
- 743 Views
Uh, that doesn't make a lot of sense
17/11/2010 07:22:59 PM
- 795 Views
That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
17/11/2010 07:26:34 PM
- 766 Views
Re: That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
17/11/2010 08:01:20 PM
- 846 Views
Actually that sounds a good plan
17/11/2010 08:06:50 PM
- 754 Views
Glad to hear you agree with yourself
17/11/2010 08:14:42 PM
- 855 Views
:/ Wanna mention this before I forget. Little niggling that's been bugging me.
17/11/2010 03:03:27 AM
- 775 Views
Ah yes, I noticed that as well
17/11/2010 04:08:15 AM
- 765 Views
I just caught that
17/11/2010 04:53:16 AM
- 884 Views
No, I don't mean Cop.
17/11/2010 05:29:36 AM
- 800 Views
Re: No, I don't mean Cop.
17/11/2010 05:34:46 AM
- 813 Views
I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
17/11/2010 06:30:26 PM
- 856 Views
Complete sidetrack.
17/11/2010 07:28:31 PM
- 869 Views
Re: Complete sidetrack.
17/11/2010 07:33:51 PM
- 753 Views
I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 05:38:53 AM
- 709 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:04:08 AM
- 737 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:25:05 AM
- 801 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:50:04 AM
- 756 Views
In the interests of honesty, now would probably be a good time to mention ...
17/11/2010 09:22:14 PM
- 791 Views
What the balls?
17/11/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 799 Views
I still only see one way for this day to end
18/11/2010 02:02:03 PM
- 758 Views
Re: I still only see one way for this day to end
18/11/2010 03:18:50 PM
- 730 Views
Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
18/11/2010 05:16:28 PM
- 932 Views
Re: Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
18/11/2010 06:00:06 PM
- 778 Views
I'd also like to point out that we know nothing about you
18/11/2010 03:37:08 PM
- 748 Views
i don't know much about comics but
18/11/2010 05:45:10 PM
- 794 Views
Re: i don't know much about comics but
18/11/2010 05:49:54 PM
- 740 Views
They're also Marvel characters
18/11/2010 06:30:11 PM
- 802 Views
LOL, duly noted
18/11/2010 06:48:08 PM
- 817 Views
Beast is really surprisingly un-beastly.
18/11/2010 06:28:15 PM
- 827 Views
Sure
18/11/2010 06:42:01 PM
- 806 Views
Alright, to hell with this. Let's test F-T's sanity. Vote: Isaac *NM*
21/11/2010 08:29:53 PM
- 500 Views
Ah, the frustration vote, normally my best friend
21/11/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 782 Views
OK, here's a question for beet:
21/11/2010 10:37:08 PM
- 774 Views
You're not suggesting we lynch F-T instead of Isaac, are you?
21/11/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 780 Views
But we do get information
22/11/2010 12:17:20 AM
- 803 Views
<-- Btw, first time I got the hammer vote. My life is now complete. *NM*
22/11/2010 12:20:53 AM
- 481 Views
Well, congrats *NM*
22/11/2010 12:32:34 AM
- 510 Views
Since this is a first for both of us...
22/11/2010 12:35:29 AM
- 776 Views
When someone dies, you find out their role. "Psycho Cop" is a distinct role.
21/11/2010 11:22:50 PM
- 785 Views
Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
22/11/2010 12:00:31 AM
- 744 Views
Re: Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
22/11/2010 12:21:01 AM
- 854 Views
Isaac has been lynched!
22/11/2010 03:10:01 AM
- 692 Views
I can't help but feel a silver bullet would have been appropriate
22/11/2010 04:11:13 AM
- 676 Views
I find that astounding, considering the level of suspicion generally laid upon you *NM*
22/11/2010 04:16:04 AM
- 548 Views
I might just mount your head on my wall .
22/11/2010 05:09:45 AM
- 866 Views
I consider myself an integral part in this group.
22/11/2010 05:27:12 AM
- 846 Views