I've dug quite a hole, but imma keep digging til I find the other side
As mentioned in my first post, the word ninja/ninjas/etc does not appear in my RM, and I had no victory condition listed. I'm not sure what you are getting at with this new scummer implication. I am specifically referring to your claimed role, as an investigator, that if ninja appears in your RM in a format of explaining how your role power works then it should not be surprising that other roles didn't have this. A cop could well have 'detect if someone is a ninja' in there text, or a miller, as I mentioned in the preceding post, whereas a town tracker or RBer has an ability that functions regardless of alignment, as would a BP, safe from vig, SK and DF alike, or a doc, a jailkeeper, a lie detector etc. A cop or miller could easily have an RM that merely said 'you detect if people are guilty or innocent' or 'you show up as guilty' without mention of ninjas, but other roles by and large would have no more reason to mention ninjas than a vanilla's would.
What I'm referring to is the victory statement. I think at first you said there was no mention of ninjas, which I thought was interesting because it would mean either there was no victory condition, or you might be scum, or... something. I didn't know which it was until F-T clarified the victory conditions (which told me it was the former). At that point, I realized it was probably a mistake to have said that, so I tried to go back.
As for the scummer thing, what I was getting at is that, if you did have the ninjas mentioned in your victory condition but not in association with your role. It's not a serious accusation since I was pretty sure that you were probably referring to them not being present at all in your RM.
So, while the ninjas in my RM were in reference to my role, I was expecting them to show up in others RMs too as part of a victory condition (a standard part of the RM, usually).
It is rather contradictory that you keep using Inadvertent Mountainous now but originally suggested all vanilla and Mountainous. They are not the same, you even linked to Mountainous so its not like it was minor confusion on terms or a slip of the tongue. Mountainous is is roleless, Inadvertent Mountainous is where the roles are setup to imply lots of power roles, like has backup roles of cop and doc but no cop or doc and investigation-immune scum. In IM virtually everyone has a role, pointless roles. Are you saying now that your investigatory role is a back up? I say I have no reason to think my role is a red herring or similiar trick.
Honestly, I think they are effectively the same thing. I believe the page I linked to had a link to Inadvertent as well, as a spin-off/variant of the mountainous-type game. My role is not a back-up, though, so... yeah.
I don't think it was a lie, but you can disagree. I mean when you're dealing with people who know how Aes Sedai talk, you have to sometimes read between the lines. I don't think anyone had claimed or suggested they were vanilla. I believe I've linked to the relevants posts already and I just don't see how anyone could have made that conclusion.
Um... yeah I've got nothing. I would say it's both in my mind, but it would be really hard to explain it. Like, on one hand it was supposed to be said in such a way that the casual reader wouldn't think I was referring to my own RM, but on the other, it was a subtle attempt to make the role-hunting mafia (who are not casual readers) think that I was less likely to be a role. Oops.
I think it will go that way, if you are town, that will suck, but realistically with no method to HC this will have been inevitable. Were you town and later claimed investigator and reported results, the vanilla hypothesis would have cast a cloud on any claim made.
In reality, I think, if I am town, it will only suck a little if I die, but I think I could really help if I'm alive. It's a risk-reward, though, and if I have to go, then... as the saying goes:
'If you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips.'
I can't accept a 'theoretical' comment of that nature, you knew it wasn't true and you said it, you said you thought it was Mountainous and linked to the very page for that, now you say Inadvertent Mountainous yet that whole concept revolves around roles, roles that are false indicators, like nurse and deputy and miller ina cop-less and doc-less game. You say you're not a miliar, you say you're investigatory.
I'm not saying I thought it was IM -- that was just an example against your arguments that the mafia would know it wasn't mountainous based on having a RB.
You're singing to the choir on that one
But really its not too effective, for one thing games are boring if people don't talk, and while we haven't done it in a while we used to lynch or threaten to lynch less talkative players. I agree with the sentiment though, I've been accused more times than I can count, as scummer of town, of being scum for things I've said, very rarely have those comments selected as 'suspicious' been even vaguely connected to any plot I was about. Lurkers gain no victory but coattail victory, which is no victory, there's a reason why some of our players with sub-par victory streaks are also the most feared, so to speak.
Yeah, I don't see the fun in a victory like that, but it does work lol
Yeah, I get that, and honestly at this point I think there is some good from me just dying anyway instead of just being a festering distraction (though again, if somehow, I could stay alive that'd be just awesome). I have to say, though, that I would look closer at Kylia's vote as well as others who are generally inactive (like White Flame, etc.). I'm not 100% convinced on Kronin either. I wouldn't auto-lynch him Day 2 though on just what he said today, but he's my suspect atm, barring something else. Also, I should say that Napoleon is rather townie for a bunch of reasons... the clues are there. So, all in all, it's definitely not the worst that could have happened and I think there were definitely some good things as well, no matter which way this ends.
And honestly, I can't keep up with this much posting for much longer. Make up your minds already, people
Why on Earth, if your role was as an investigator and it mentioned ninjas as part of that, presumably "Can investigate someone to find out if they are a ninja" or such, would you be surprised mine didn't mention it? Anyway we'll get back to this in a moment...
As I said, usually there would be a message like "destroy all the ninjas to win" as part of the role message (victory condition). If that's NOT what you are referring to, then I have to re-consider my analysis that you are, in fact, town. So, please answer exactly what you mean by that... did you mean that ninjas were not mentioned anywhere at all, or that they weren't mentioned with regard to you role? If they weren't mentioned at all, don't you find that strange with regard to how a role message is usually formatted?
As mentioned in my first post, the word ninja/ninjas/etc does not appear in my RM, and I had no victory condition listed. I'm not sure what you are getting at with this new scummer implication. I am specifically referring to your claimed role, as an investigator, that if ninja appears in your RM in a format of explaining how your role power works then it should not be surprising that other roles didn't have this. A cop could well have 'detect if someone is a ninja' in there text, or a miller, as I mentioned in the preceding post, whereas a town tracker or RBer has an ability that functions regardless of alignment, as would a BP, safe from vig, SK and DF alike, or a doc, a jailkeeper, a lie detector etc. A cop or miller could easily have an RM that merely said 'you detect if people are guilty or innocent' or 'you show up as guilty' without mention of ninjas, but other roles by and large would have no more reason to mention ninjas than a vanilla's would.
What I'm referring to is the victory statement. I think at first you said there was no mention of ninjas, which I thought was interesting because it would mean either there was no victory condition, or you might be scum, or... something. I didn't know which it was until F-T clarified the victory conditions (which told me it was the former). At that point, I realized it was probably a mistake to have said that, so I tried to go back.
As for the scummer thing, what I was getting at is that, if you did have the ninjas mentioned in your victory condition but not in association with your role. It's not a serious accusation since I was pretty sure that you were probably referring to them not being present at all in your RM.
So, while the ninjas in my RM were in reference to my role, I was expecting them to show up in others RMs too as part of a victory condition (a standard part of the RM, usually).
I feel like I'm going in circles explaining this... first of all, even if the DFs have a roleblocker, that doesn't mean there are any real town roles. That's the whole point of the Inadvertent Mountainous setup. And why should a roled townie claim to prevent other townies from thinking it is a vanilla game? What harm is there in that? It just destroys the plan anyway.
It is rather contradictory that you keep using Inadvertent Mountainous now but originally suggested all vanilla and Mountainous. They are not the same, you even linked to Mountainous so its not like it was minor confusion on terms or a slip of the tongue. Mountainous is is roleless, Inadvertent Mountainous is where the roles are setup to imply lots of power roles, like has backup roles of cop and doc but no cop or doc and investigation-immune scum. In IM virtually everyone has a role, pointless roles. Are you saying now that your investigatory role is a back up? I say I have no reason to think my role is a red herring or similiar trick.
Honestly, I think they are effectively the same thing. I believe the page I linked to had a link to Inadvertent as well, as a spin-off/variant of the mountainous-type game. My role is not a back-up, though, so... yeah.
At best you just didn't think this out, I keep, and other keep, saying why this was dangerous, we've discussed things like this before in prior games. Again, first and foremost, people rarely guess other people's secret plans and don't always think things through. It is very likely others would have claimed vanilla quite honestly, and endangered everyone else. 12 players, 2 or 3 bad guys probably 3, probably 3 or more town roles, lets say three people claimed vanilla. Ninjas now have 6 candidates for role and probably half or more of them are, not good. Next, there's adding to a lie. IF a few people claimed vanilla a role could easily get spooked about assassination and claim vanilla, now a few Days later they need to make a RC because maybe they're the doc and we're near LyLo and the probable lynch candidate is someone they protected previously and foiled a kill on. OR you have a questionable role, like miller, town roleblocker, or jailkeeper, you sure don't want to be confronted when trying to sell that RC with having de facto lied earlier, like claiming to be some sort of investigatory role after saying the game might be vanilla, regardless of what you say about 'hypothetical' and it not being connected to your RM, that just doesn't fly. We're not going in circles here I just don't buy a roled character suggesting an all vanilla game that way.
I don't think it was a lie, but you can disagree. I mean when you're dealing with people who know how Aes Sedai talk, you have to sometimes read between the lines. I don't think anyone had claimed or suggested they were vanilla. I believe I've linked to the relevants posts already and I just don't see how anyone could have made that conclusion.
And this is another thing, you argue on the one hand that you presented this idea as a theoretical thought, yet at the same time you present your actions on the matter as though you had a prepared strategy in mind with it? Which is it? Idle speculation or master plan, many of the former can turn into the latter surely but they typically don't exist as both simultaneously.
Um... yeah I've got nothing. I would say it's both in my mind, but it would be really hard to explain it. Like, on one hand it was supposed to be said in such a way that the casual reader wouldn't think I was referring to my own RM, but on the other, it was a subtle attempt to make the role-hunting mafia (who are not casual readers) think that I was less likely to be a role. Oops.
Well, I would be pretty surprised if there was another person with a role like the one I have. I think it was designed to be unique. But if you don't think I am what I say I am, then there is not much I can do about that, except die lol.
I think it will go that way, if you are town, that will suck, but realistically with no method to HC this will have been inevitable. Were you town and later claimed investigator and reported results, the vanilla hypothesis would have cast a cloud on any claim made.
In reality, I think, if I am town, it will only suck a little if I die, but I think I could really help if I'm alive. It's a risk-reward, though, and if I have to go, then... as the saying goes:
'If you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips.'
Now the final bit, your last few messages you've been saying you thought I was town because of my early comments, that's a lie, because you outright tried to label me scum as recently as <a href="http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/146981/">two days ago</a> and some of the explanations you're putting forward for your actions don't jibe with that ...
Well, that was a mistake on my part. I just came back from RBIRL and I wasn't really paying attention to your early comments (which really were like the first few posts of the game). My accusation was based on your role-fishing accusation, which had nothing to do at the time with your early remarks about RMs. The two didn't really become connected (in my mind at least) until a bit later.
"Well, by itself, no. As I've explained, I consider those that made a statement about ninjas early on to be townies. Lack of a statement, coupled with the slip, and by process of elimination, he's more likely to be scum than the other choices."
... so you thought I was scummy two days ago for my very comments on the matter but a week before that and now as well you think those prove me townie? What happened two days ago? Me accusing you of being scummy for your ambiguous comments? The ones around the very same points that made you think I was town?
No... I think you should re-read those posts. As I said, that's not what I was referring to. It's pretty clear I was referring to the role-fishing accusation, not the ninja-RM deal. The role-fishing accusation did seem like a scum trap to me, but I wasn't paying attention to the stuff from early on. So, if you can, please show where I said you were scummy for saying there were no ninjas in your RM. What I said you were scummy for was claiming a role, then accusing me of role-fishing to out the roles (self-fulfilling prophecy, if you wish).
No, I'm not buying it
It is possible your town, but you've made too many apparently deceptive moves for me to accept that as likely, and if you are, I think you may still represent a threat to us.
My 'deceptive' moves:
1. Responding to one of your first posts of the game in a theoretical fashion.
I can't accept a 'theoretical' comment of that nature, you knew it wasn't true and you said it, you said you thought it was Mountainous and linked to the very page for that, now you say Inadvertent Mountainous yet that whole concept revolves around roles, roles that are false indicators, like nurse and deputy and miller ina cop-less and doc-less game. You say you're not a miliar, you say you're investigatory.
I'm not saying I thought it was IM -- that was just an example against your arguments that the mafia would know it wasn't mountainous based on having a RB.
See, this is why scum should lurk like crazy, especially Day 1. Townies will just tunnel down and string themselves up over the most random things.
You're singing to the choir on that one
But really its not too effective, for one thing games are boring if people don't talk, and while we haven't done it in a while we used to lynch or threaten to lynch less talkative players. I agree with the sentiment though, I've been accused more times than I can count, as scummer of town, of being scum for things I've said, very rarely have those comments selected as 'suspicious' been even vaguely connected to any plot I was about. Lurkers gain no victory but coattail victory, which is no victory, there's a reason why some of our players with sub-par victory streaks are also the most feared, so to speak.
Yeah, I don't see the fun in a victory like that, but it does work lol
For what its worth, I do have some great doubts on this one, convince me I'm wrong, that I've got a Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy going on in your case, and I'll drop my vote. If there's no better candidate to be had, I'm content with blitzkrieging lurkers, its been a while since we rattled that cage and it could use it after last game. But there just seem to be too many contradictions in your statements, none of them are damning in of themselves, but... as a whole, and on day 1
Yeah, I get that, and honestly at this point I think there is some good from me just dying anyway instead of just being a festering distraction (though again, if somehow, I could stay alive that'd be just awesome). I have to say, though, that I would look closer at Kylia's vote as well as others who are generally inactive (like White Flame, etc.). I'm not 100% convinced on Kronin either. I wouldn't auto-lynch him Day 2 though on just what he said today, but he's my suspect atm, barring something else. Also, I should say that Napoleon is rather townie for a bunch of reasons... the clues are there. So, all in all, it's definitely not the worst that could have happened and I think there were definitely some good things as well, no matter which way this ends.
And honestly, I can't keep up with this much posting for much longer. Make up your minds already, people
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 1: Pirates versus Ninjas
- 28/08/2010 03:58:14 AM
3272 Views
Voting Record
- 28/08/2010 03:58:46 AM
1319 Views
Incidentally...
- 31/08/2010 01:58:55 AM
1374 Views
I do, in fact
- 31/08/2010 02:16:25 AM
1304 Views
Yes, that might make more sense
- 31/08/2010 02:22:07 AM
1277 Views
No, it's the other way around
- 31/08/2010 02:31:39 AM
1306 Views
Re: No, it's the other way around
- 31/08/2010 02:33:48 AM
1256 Views
Yeah I thought that was pretty funny
- 31/08/2010 02:37:43 AM
1282 Views
- 31/08/2010 02:37:43 AM
1282 Views
*NM*
Arrr, Vote ?
- 28/08/2010 05:34:48 AM
1228 Views
Yarr, I hear ya, matey
- 28/08/2010 06:00:15 AM
1192 Views
He's got a point matey!
- 28/08/2010 03:39:20 PM
1272 Views
Arr pirates don't ask questions!
- 28/08/2010 09:12:10 PM
1198 Views
what about rhetorical questions?
- 28/08/2010 09:54:08 PM
1344 Views
He's got a point matey!
- 28/08/2010 03:39:25 PM
1146 Views
Okay
- 28/08/2010 06:03:54 AM
1310 Views
Yes, Pirate = town, Ninja = Mafia.
- 28/08/2010 06:09:16 AM
1298 Views
What, we're not all using pirate speech for this game?
- 28/08/2010 06:13:09 AM
1323 Views
Argh ye matey... or something, no I'll pass for now
- 28/08/2010 06:33:35 AM
1473 Views
- 28/08/2010 06:33:35 AM
1473 Views
umm, yo ho?
- 28/08/2010 10:25:19 AM
1273 Views
... and a bottle of rum
- 28/08/2010 11:53:39 AM
1279 Views
I don't really like this claim five roles thing.
- 28/08/2010 09:54:10 PM
1334 Views
Not overjoyed at it either to be honest
- 28/08/2010 10:20:49 PM
1297 Views
After thinking it over, I don't like it either
- 28/08/2010 11:15:41 PM
1127 Views
I agree.
- 28/08/2010 11:27:53 PM
1303 Views
Re: I agree.
- 29/08/2010 12:10:36 AM
1299 Views
I don't think it will be fruitful, to be completely honest
- 29/08/2010 12:25:02 AM
1184 Views
Well, not spam per se, but certainly give their opinions at least. *NM*
- 29/08/2010 12:29:54 AM
1238 Views
yeah...I don't like the five roles thing either...
- 29/08/2010 10:34:25 AM
1226 Views
Re: yeah...I don't like the five roles thing either...
- 29/08/2010 05:43:10 PM
1086 Views
I wonder how this is going to work.
- 29/08/2010 06:01:48 PM
1280 Views
Re: I wonder how this is going to work.
- 29/08/2010 07:05:25 PM
1309 Views
I think any millers should just claim now
- 29/08/2010 09:46:47 PM
1199 Views
Not sure
- 29/08/2010 10:43:46 PM
1216 Views
I think it would help if they did
- 29/08/2010 10:53:25 PM
1256 Views
Maybe
- 29/08/2010 11:08:36 PM
1170 Views
That format for mass roleclaiming won't work
- 30/08/2010 01:15:11 AM
1113 Views
We can go into later
- 30/08/2010 02:20:12 AM
1281 Views
Has anyone actually claimed vanilla?
- 30/08/2010 09:56:15 AM
1215 Views
a question.
- 30/08/2010 12:25:48 PM
1235 Views
By the way...
- 29/08/2010 11:19:33 PM
1238 Views
No ninjas were mentioned in your RM? Interesting. *NM*
- 28/08/2010 06:44:38 AM
703 Views
Nope, I take they were in yours? Anything useful? *NM*
- 28/08/2010 07:01:54 AM
702 Views
Hmm, maybe, but too early to say just yet. *NM*
- 28/08/2010 10:54:59 PM
698 Views
Just to clarify, that "maybe" applies to both parts of your question. *NM*
- 29/08/2010 06:13:15 PM
698 Views
Re: Okay
- 28/08/2010 10:53:23 PM
1251 Views
Ah, here is a link
- 28/08/2010 10:57:48 PM
1167 Views
I don't really think we're in one of those
- 28/08/2010 11:03:20 PM
1235 Views
Yeah, maybe not then
- 29/08/2010 12:17:40 AM
1134 Views
How would the mafia know?
- 29/08/2010 03:54:46 AM
1181 Views
My RM didn't say anything about ninjas...
- 29/08/2010 04:40:23 AM
1183 Views
i just realised something
*NM*
Day 1 EVENT: Treasure Hunt
- 30/08/2010 08:16:27 AM
1287 Views
How many votes do we have and how many people will be selected? *NM*
- 30/08/2010 09:28:32 AM
745 Views
Hmm... Treasure Vote: ?
- 30/08/2010 03:21:36 PM
1281 Views
I thought that was a question at first.
- 30/08/2010 05:39:37 PM
1255 Views
I would be willing to vote myself but why do you want to get rid of me? *NM*
- 31/08/2010 02:46:37 AM
637 Views
I'd like to hear a bit more of an explanation about this
- 31/08/2010 02:49:13 AM
1285 Views
Yeah I kind of skipped over that part...
- 31/08/2010 04:01:31 AM
1207 Views
I can't see that being the case though
- 31/08/2010 04:28:01 AM
1275 Views
I have a feeling
- 31/08/2010 04:40:44 AM
1218 Views
It's a real possibility
- 31/08/2010 04:53:23 AM
1222 Views
23 - Treasure Vote: Yunalesca
- 31/08/2010 04:55:47 AM
1198 Views
I think the Treasure Vote should go to.....
- 31/08/2010 05:46:59 AM
1223 Views
Do you really mean that?
- 31/08/2010 05:55:12 AM
1258 Views
Huh?
- 31/08/2010 06:10:56 AM
1194 Views
We aren't going to get anywhere if we all vote for ourselves...
- 31/08/2010 04:12:05 AM
1253 Views
The hunt party will go forth whether you use your vote or not
- 31/08/2010 04:18:52 AM
1178 Views
There certainly isn't a guarantee that it is good, and whilst it is not the end of the world if a n
- 31/08/2010 04:43:25 AM
1287 Views
Well
- 31/08/2010 06:02:59 AM
1259 Views
Since Tvoting myself is obviously not helpful...
- 31/08/2010 10:00:49 AM
1352 Views
Ok...sorry about my absence for well...all the game so far
- 30/08/2010 07:03:56 PM
1193 Views
Not voting will just delay the event
- 31/08/2010 04:23:42 AM
1115 Views
Agreed, best everyone vote and get it over with
- 01/09/2010 02:59:27 AM
1074 Views
Does it really matter who goes?
- 01/09/2010 03:05:24 AM
1142 Views
Because we are rash and impatient, that's why.
- 01/09/2010 03:28:49 AM
1117 Views
- 01/09/2010 03:28:49 AM
1117 Views
Re: Because we are rash and impatient, that's why.
- 01/09/2010 03:50:07 AM
1211 Views
- 01/09/2010 03:50:07 AM
1211 Views
Sure. What do you suggest we do with it? *NM*
- 01/09/2010 03:53:57 AM
641 Views
Re: Sure. What do you suggest we do with it?
- 01/09/2010 03:13:30 PM
1130 Views
Well I think the instructions specifically say we ought to give it to someone trustworthy
- 01/09/2010 06:21:06 PM
1301 Views
Re: Well I think the instructions specifically say we ought to give it to someone trustworthy
- 01/09/2010 07:14:05 PM
1268 Views
to avoid a posting slump?
- 01/09/2010 08:54:18 PM
1302 Views
I think it means "Verified Townie"
- 01/09/2010 09:07:31 PM
1310 Views
It actually means vanilla townie (at least that's how we've been using it)
- 01/09/2010 10:44:42 PM
1245 Views
Why should we give it to a Vanilla Townie?
- 02/09/2010 12:47:35 AM
1203 Views
Well if we find out someone is a vt then why would we not give him the role?
- 02/09/2010 12:59:50 AM
1167 Views
What role? *NM*
- 02/09/2010 01:02:04 AM
766 Views
The role, as in the job to go on the treasure hunt. *NM*
- 02/09/2010 02:30:01 AM
674 Views
F-T said that the Treasure Hunt would be resolved before the end of the day
- 02/09/2010 02:39:44 AM
1165 Views
Oh, and also!
- 02/09/2010 02:44:54 AM
1200 Views
But that's not really a role since there is no guarantee it comes with any powers or abilities *NM*
- 02/09/2010 03:49:13 AM
725 Views
Lets watch that Horizontal Scroll, also...
- 02/09/2010 03:37:54 AM
1336 Views
And apparently the vertical scroll as well
- 02/09/2010 03:53:13 AM
1188 Views
I'm inclined to ask FT to copy the effected messages and delete them
- 02/09/2010 04:52:24 AM
1280 Views
It could have been a slip
- 02/09/2010 05:13:16 AM
1201 Views
HAS NO ONE READ MY CLARIFICATION?
- 02/09/2010 03:24:25 PM
1247 Views
It really does not help you.
- 02/09/2010 10:12:43 PM
1283 Views
Vote: Darth_Katie
- 02/09/2010 03:58:35 AM
1202 Views
Just to clarify, I was referring to Treasure Hunt votes, not lynch *NM*
- 02/09/2010 05:00:34 AM
691 Views
*NM*
- 02/09/2010 05:00:34 AM
691 Views
Treasure vote: Isaac
- 02/09/2010 05:51:31 AM
1311 Views
An irrelevant vote is probably better than no vote.
- 02/09/2010 06:08:00 AM
1264 Views
The top 3 vote-getters will be going, I think
- 02/09/2010 07:26:28 AM
1188 Views
I think that just means that up to 3 votes will be counted. *NM*
- 02/09/2010 01:39:26 PM
710 Views
"People" implies plural, but we can ask FT... casts Summon Mod
- 02/09/2010 03:44:21 PM
1313 Views
Off to get the treasure.
- 03/09/2010 12:19:34 AM
1305 Views
Can they still participate in convo even though they were voted off the island...errr ship? *NM*
- 03/09/2010 05:40:28 AM
733 Views
Probably worth checking
- 03/09/2010 05:59:32 AM
1230 Views
Samesies.
- 04/09/2010 07:48:53 AM
1254 Views
Well, now that that's done...
- 03/09/2010 07:49:47 AM
1201 Views
I love random voting
- 03/09/2010 06:36:11 PM
1141 Views
Event: Wrath of Mod
- 03/09/2010 09:49:24 PM
1169 Views
OK! Posting slump 
- 06/09/2010 12:38:39 PM
1319 Views
- 06/09/2010 12:38:39 PM
1319 Views
i think thats what everyone is waiting for.
- 06/09/2010 01:03:52 PM
1206 Views
Let's be honest, it's a terribly weak accusation
- 06/09/2010 03:20:09 PM
1200 Views
Re: Let's be honest, it's a terribly weak accusation
- 06/09/2010 03:29:17 PM
1299 Views
But why would anyone actually say that?
- 06/09/2010 03:37:22 PM
1237 Views
Re: But why would anyone actually say that?
- 06/09/2010 03:43:53 PM
1373 Views
Re: But why would anyone actually say that?
- 06/09/2010 05:23:56 PM
1192 Views
Re: But why would anyone actually say that?
- 06/09/2010 06:21:40 PM
1220 Views
Re: But why would anyone actually say that?
- 06/09/2010 08:12:27 PM
1209 Views
I think it depends on if you assume it is appropriate for Townies to lie or not.
- 06/09/2010 09:21:03 PM
1211 Views
terminology question...
- 07/09/2010 07:16:21 AM
1215 Views
"Finger of Suspicion"
- 07/09/2010 07:41:20 AM
1223 Views
ah, thanks. and since you seem to be around...
- 07/09/2010 07:53:41 AM
1243 Views
Because it makes perfect sense to do so
- 06/09/2010 06:12:13 PM
1267 Views
One detail there requires more explanation
- 06/09/2010 06:38:22 PM
1266 Views
Re: One detail there requires more explanation
- 06/09/2010 07:32:54 PM
1304 Views
There is such a thing as WIFOM and it's in every game. Both sides can use it to their advantage.
- 06/09/2010 08:07:52 PM
1274 Views
Re: There is such a thing as WIFOM and it's in every game. Both sides can use it to their advantage.
- 06/09/2010 09:33:41 PM
1296 Views
No, typically townies get lynched trying to WIFOM
- 06/09/2010 09:43:01 PM
1148 Views
- 06/09/2010 09:43:01 PM
1148 Views
Also: Yes, but
- 06/09/2010 08:15:22 PM
1230 Views
Yeah, he was
- 06/09/2010 08:58:19 PM
1311 Views
I guess no one likes listening to me. *NM*
- 06/09/2010 09:18:10 PM
670 Views
Does Isaac really get made scum by the mods more than others? *NM*
- 07/09/2010 07:08:15 AM
737 Views
Most, hopefully all, mods assign roles and alignment randomly, and I've been town mostly
- 07/09/2010 02:14:58 PM
1198 Views
so when you're a DF, games tend to sun longer? Hmm.... *is teasing* *NM*
- 08/09/2010 06:01:14 AM
774 Views
*NM*
- 08/09/2010 06:01:14 AM
774 Views
Quick summary of my thoughts
- 07/09/2010 05:58:50 AM
1216 Views
An even quicker one.
- 07/09/2010 07:50:20 AM
1357 Views
- 07/09/2010 07:50:20 AM
1357 Views
Hm... not too much to go on. I think we should lynch BlackAdder, to be honest.
- 07/09/2010 09:10:53 PM
1236 Views
I am wary of this logic
- 07/09/2010 09:17:14 PM
1156 Views
I think it's a minor Day 1 slip that we should seize upon
- 08/09/2010 02:41:49 AM
1131 Views
Your argument is that if my RM mentions ninjas, then I must be a ninja
- 08/09/2010 06:06:58 AM
1215 Views
Partially yes
- 08/09/2010 03:15:00 PM
1235 Views
Whoa. An all-cop game would be pretty cool.
- 08/09/2010 06:57:21 PM
1270 Views
I'm pretty sure they exist, from what I've read on Mafiascum.
- 08/09/2010 10:01:01 PM
1179 Views
Oh, no I didn't.
- 09/09/2010 12:15:37 AM
1269 Views
Re: Partially yes
- 08/09/2010 10:25:29 PM
1230 Views
I find this hard to accept, its also why I warn people about these sorts of maneuvers
- 09/09/2010 12:19:02 AM
1262 Views
Re: I find this hard to accept, its also why I warn people about these sorts of maneuvers
- 09/09/2010 04:01:40 AM
1172 Views
Your statements here are contradictory
- 09/09/2010 05:26:17 AM
1234 Views
I get where you're coming from
- 09/09/2010 07:00:53 AM
1246 Views
I don't know what to believe here.
- 09/09/2010 03:31:57 AM
1286 Views
Re: I don't know what to believe here.
- 09/09/2010 04:21:58 AM
1172 Views
Ninja RM Mention (Table)
- 08/09/2010 10:08:04 PM
1270 Views
And as a separate query...
- 09/09/2010 04:34:36 AM
1203 Views
answer.
- 09/09/2010 09:41:23 AM
1312 Views
- 09/09/2010 09:41:23 AM
1312 Views
I think it was when I said there were no ninjas in my RM, right before I went RBIRL
- 09/09/2010 03:42:02 PM
1248 Views
yeah...I totally cannot figure out your reply in the context of anything I just said.
- 10/09/2010 08:20:15 AM
1257 Views
- 10/09/2010 08:20:15 AM
1257 Views
Re: yeah...I totally cannot figure out your reply in the context of anything I just said.
- 10/09/2010 03:36:04 PM
1218 Views
- 10/09/2010 03:36:04 PM
1218 Views
Posting slump and fence sitters
- 12/09/2010 07:11:42 PM
1216 Views
Re: Posting slump and fence sitters
- 12/09/2010 07:27:39 PM
1380 Views
Re: Posting slump and fence sitters
- 12/09/2010 09:17:41 PM
1186 Views
wow, Yanks have lots of days off...
- 13/09/2010 12:01:45 AM
1287 Views
We had class on Labor Day ... what a rip off *NM*
- 13/09/2010 12:55:37 AM
683 Views
Not at all, students should be happy
- 13/09/2010 01:03:52 AM
1215 Views
People who would cheer at the opportunity to shop are alien beyond my comprehension.
- 13/09/2010 02:35:45 AM
1234 Views
No, just a lot of holidays
- 13/09/2010 12:56:22 AM
1374 Views
ok!
- 13/09/2010 01:02:30 AM
1178 Views
Re: ok!
- 13/09/2010 01:16:23 AM
1233 Views
What kind of heathens eat ham on Thanksgiving?
- 13/09/2010 01:46:09 AM
1277 Views
Re: What kind of heathens eat ham on Thanksgiving?
- 13/09/2010 01:50:52 AM
1273 Views
Re: What kind of heathens eat ham on Thanksgiving?
- 13/09/2010 02:13:58 AM
1284 Views
Who's going to hammer? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 12:24:49 AM
697 Views
I guess I will
- 13/09/2010 01:41:37 AM
1478 Views