Do you want to debate Trump's achievements or not? If you're not in the mood, that's fine, but then give it a rest with these lame one-sentence non-answers in your last three posts that are just making you look bad. If yes, great, then you can reply to what I wrote before all that.
I don't think you are trying to engage in serious debate when you are trying to separate the President/his administration from each other when its common to discuss the two as one in the US. You replied with what you thought of his achievements/not-achievements. I would have engaged in a debate but for the above tangent we went on the definition of whose achievements they were/are.
Anyway, I honestly don't think I look bad. I think you're looking biased. We're all biased of course. And why engage in further debate when you'll just say we are talking not at each other but missing each other's points? We'll find something else to debate about in the future I am sure. But for this one? My above post about his achievements stands.