View original postImpeachment is Constitutionally provided for only in the case of high crimes and misdemeanors. Subjective issues like incompetence & embarrassment don't count. The whole of point the belief in the "Rule of Law" that the Democrats have chosen as their club with which to beat Trump, is that you can't just decide the laws mean what is convenient for you.
Yeah, that part was rather tongue in cheek, I'm aware that those aren't actually grounds for impeachment. Though there's nothing subjective about Trump being incompetent or about him massively damaging the global reputation of the US - especially now that he was actually reelected, with even a plurality of the popular vote.
And by the way, earlier this year Republicans launched impeachment proceedings against Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, on account of his failing to secure the border sufficiently - that's pretty much impeachment for incompetence, no? And that did pass the House in the end with almost all Republicans voting for it, despite all the people commenting it wasn't constitutional, though it went nowhere in the Senate.
View original postFurthermore, you cannot deny that Biden could and should have been impeached on these very grounds, hence your motive 
- it's the only scenario in which Kamala "Less Appealing than Hilary" Harris, gets to be President.
- it's the only scenario in which Kamala "Less Appealing than Hilary" Harris, gets to be President. Heh, yes, if those were grounds for impeachment, I certainly could've seen the Republicans launching the procedure against Biden, with the Dems' main counter-argument being 'well he may be bad at the job but he's still miles better than Trump'.
View original postMe, I'll be rooting for impeachment proceedings from now until January 20, 2029.
You say that now, but wait until we see who runs in 2028...
No Fucks Left to Give Joe tosses Hunter a blanket pardon
- 02/12/2024 09:23:33 PM
299 Views
I think if he hadn't said he wouldn't pardon his son, then this would be a non-issue.
- 03/12/2024 12:53:15 PM
41 Views
Re: I think if he hadn't said he wouldn't pardon his son, then this would be a non-issue.
- 03/12/2024 01:32:17 PM
40 Views
I don't agree with that - it would've been a serious issue still.
- 03/12/2024 05:56:18 PM
47 Views
How about this?
- 04/12/2024 03:43:52 AM
43 Views
I don't believe he'd been sentenced for those crimes, yet, had he?
- 04/12/2024 07:14:04 AM
37 Views
Per 'old news', his sentencing dates were Dec 12 for the gun charge and 16 for tax evasion
- 04/12/2024 01:30:11 PM
33 Views
Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though.
- 04/12/2024 07:18:56 AM
41 Views
Re: Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though.
- 04/12/2024 02:07:41 PM
38 Views
Ugh, I hate this 'they're all the same' rhetoric.
- 04/12/2024 09:22:38 PM
34 Views
I respectfully disagree.
- 04/12/2024 11:09:07 PM
37 Views
Seems like we're kind of talking past each other here.
- 05/12/2024 11:39:02 PM
31 Views
Trump had quite a few successes in his first term
- 06/12/2024 02:45:32 PM
35 Views
You mean his administration and Congress had those successes.
- 06/12/2024 10:12:25 PM
45 Views
No, I mean him. *NM*
- 07/12/2024 12:38:27 AM
11 Views
Okay, then I guess we're not debating it, as you like. *NM*
- 07/12/2024 08:54:03 AM
13 Views
The achievements of the administration are attributed to the President.
- 08/12/2024 10:50:43 AM
34 Views
Some people also think the earth is flat.
- 08/12/2024 06:29:37 PM
31 Views
Le sigh
- 08/12/2024 09:03:01 PM
33 Views
Make up your mind already.
- 08/12/2024 10:30:11 PM
30 Views
I listed his/the administration's achievements. What is there to debate?
- 08/12/2024 11:03:15 PM
35 Views
Debate tends to involve a back and forth, not just one side stating their views.
- 09/12/2024 05:58:22 PM
34 Views
- 09/12/2024 05:58:22 PM
34 Views
Re: You mean his administration and Congress had those successes.
- 09/12/2024 04:28:58 AM
39 Views
That, and way overpromise on what can actually be achieved by cracking down on China.
- 09/12/2024 05:12:49 PM
40 Views
Re: That, and way overpromise on what can actually be achieved by cracking down on China.
- 10/12/2024 06:55:27 PM
35 Views
Hm. It doesn't seem like we disagree that much on the 'true partnerships' then.
- 10/12/2024 07:52:39 PM
31 Views
Re: Hm. It doesn't seem like we disagree that much on the 'true partnerships' then.
- 10/12/2024 10:46:13 PM
33 Views
I see what you're saying, but I think that approach only works in the short term
- 10/12/2024 11:54:59 PM
31 Views
Re: I see what you're saying, but I think that approach only works in the short term
- 11/12/2024 04:11:09 AM
39 Views
I mostly agree, with one giant caveat
- 05/12/2024 02:56:02 PM
43 Views
We've been over this - some of this is true, some is, at a minimum, not proven that I ever saw.
- 05/12/2024 11:18:24 PM
38 Views
I know it was factually true
- 06/12/2024 12:46:44 AM
41 Views
Sounds like you need to become a whistleblower and go talk to the FBI yourself, then?
- 06/12/2024 11:37:00 AM
37 Views
Typically, whistle blower and attorney client privilege are not viewed as compatible.
- 06/12/2024 03:57:12 PM
37 Views
I have a clearance
- 06/12/2024 05:01:07 PM
39 Views
Re: I have a clearance
- 06/12/2024 08:08:50 PM
41 Views
Seriously?
- 06/12/2024 10:28:07 PM
36 Views
I can't believe I'm siding with Tom here
- 07/12/2024 01:50:15 AM
36 Views
- 07/12/2024 01:50:15 AM
36 Views
I guess you kinda have to with your profession.
- 07/12/2024 07:46:01 PM
33 Views
- 07/12/2024 07:46:01 PM
33 Views
You're CLEARLY a Harris plant
- 06/12/2024 01:07:07 AM
39 Views
Hah, you got me!
- 06/12/2024 11:49:19 AM
36 Views
Re: Hah, you got me!
- 07/12/2024 04:52:06 AM
35 Views
It's true that both parties have contributed to the decline of political norms/courtesies, yes.
- 07/12/2024 09:42:18 PM
31 Views
Re: It's true that both parties have contributed to the decline of political norms/courtesies, yes.
- 10/12/2024 11:18:52 AM
32 Views