View original postIn 2020, the world was bathed in a novel virus with unknown origins and unknown outcomes on the populace. Hindsight has pinned the likelihood of the origins to gain-of-function laboratories in Wuhan and the outcomes being similar to that of the flu. To this day, the institutions downplay both of those points.
Hindsight has pinned the likelihood of the origins to wetmarkets, given that the closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 exists naturally in bats.
The outcomes are "similar" to the flu in the sense that elderly vaccinated people are no longer orders of magnitude more likely to die from Covid-19 than from the flu. They're only about four times more likely.
The vaccines are estimated to have saved over 20 million lives.
No.
Correct.
View original postI say that myopic studies can be set up to indicate whatever the industries that create the studies want them to say.
That is stupid.
View original postAre people suffering from more mental disorders and need to be medicated? Are people suffering more from health disorders that need medical intervention? Again, the institutions say yes to both of those.
The institutions are saying that more people are being diagnosed with mental disorders. Which is true.
View original postSay what you will about RFK (Jr), but he is a threat to the establishment that permeates the above issues that I highlighted and more.
To the extent that he is allowing the nonsense you have been writing in your post to flourish, yes, he's dangerous.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*