in 2016, for instance, Hillary won the popular vote nationwide by 2.9 million votes. She won the popular vote in California by 4.3 million votes. None of which did her any good, except rhetorically.
But also the link below, which (I haven't read his post yet) I assume Greg is also making this point.
In particular, in one of the comments at my link:
I've made this point to you before (that the system(s) in Europe are even worse at getting to 'the person who gets the most votes wins the election' but maybe that's not your actual complaint?