We disagree, but I'm no idiot.

Let's go with your comparison; you think me the bandits, perhaps, or the "righteous" men who passed the victim by? Because that's ludicrous.

Here is a man, abused by the world, beaten, lied to, deeply wounded. Told that, to be loved, they have to accept they're someone God made either incorrectly on His part, or as some sort of cruel joke or irony, and the only way to be happy, is to change what God made them.

And me, the random fucking dude who wanted to bitch about Al Sharpton on the internet, and somehow got roped into a multi-week, multi-pronged assault by multiple people calling me some variant of "asshole", trying to tell people that, hey, maybe they should accept who God made them to be.

What part of those makes me the bandit? Am I "misleading" or "abusing" Ghav? If I'm some crazy street doomseer, walk away from me. No harm there, I'm keeping nobody around, and forcing nobody to listen to me.

What part of that makes me the "righteous" men? I see this person lied to, lying to themselves, telling themselves they know better than God, and I try and say "look, you're in serious danger here. Stop harming kids, accept your sin, and accept forgiveness".

What part of that makes me anything but the Samaritan? Am I being applauded by men, here? Am I ignoring the wounded because of some feeble "law"?

Or am I truly trying to help one who is wounded and lost?