Active Users:533 Time:05/07/2025 06:31:46 PM
Not just in 2022, though fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM

View original post
In 2022, all news articles are opinion pieces, regardless of the source.

Walter Cronkite was an opinion journalist. He chose what to report on, and what not to report on. And any number of issues and injustices were ignored by him, not even out of malice or indifference, necessarily. Just lack of awareness, which every human suffers from, is enough to make the idea of "objective" news nonsensical.

News is, and always will be, a two way street. Yes, the journalist must use the utmost caution to be factual and at least acknowledge other perspectives, if only to poke holes in them. But the news consumer must also do their due diligence. Believe no one person fully, diversify your sources, and spend the time to get as full a picture as possible

Refusing to spend that time and simply blaming the media is a chickenish way to absolve oneself of responsibility.

Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 767 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 474 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 258 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 445 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 439 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 497 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 400 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 410 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 411 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 419 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 253 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 416 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 387 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 430 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 242 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 456 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 257 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 425 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 408 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 388 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 423 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 396 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 620 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 426 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 246 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 408 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 413 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 433 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 408 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 418 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 409 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 443 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 384 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 431 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 393 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 421 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 540 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 389 Views

Reply to Message