Active Users:1126 Time:23/11/2024 04:15:27 AM
But along those same lines.... Jeordam Send a noteboard - 18/04/2019 11:54:06 PM

At least in the show....the immunity to fire/heat seems exclusive to Danny. In the books at least, Jon did burn his hand on the lantern when the walkers/zombies/whatever we call them here woke up (book/season 1). Her brother Visceras (sp?) was certainly not resistant to heat. And presumably the old Maester Ammon could burn himself on something. We didn't see it, but one can't imagine he could live at the Wall for years, and no one notice that the old man is totally good with fire/hot.

I think that Danny's immunity to heat/fire is a result of the show writers trying to demonstrate that she is special/The Slayer/whatever. If anything, Jon having Stark blood from his mother's side would only make him partially immune.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Game of Thrones - Final Season Thread! - 15/04/2019 01:30:10 AM 882 Views
I am on Team Cersei, only about half ironically - 15/04/2019 04:50:38 AM 428 Views
Sansa had no control over her first marriage - 15/04/2019 08:34:47 AM 372 Views
Re: Sansa had no control over her first marriage - 15/04/2019 02:17:40 PM 429 Views
I liked it. - 15/04/2019 08:25:01 AM 443 Views
I assume Bran can use his Bran-abilities to prove Jon's backstory. - 15/04/2019 02:13:21 PM 380 Views
What are you, some kind of book snob? *NM* - 15/04/2019 02:18:28 PM 174 Views
Anyway, thoughts on the episode - 17/04/2019 12:42:05 PM 414 Views
They're attempting to create political tension between Jon and Dany. - 17/04/2019 01:16:59 PM 357 Views
Agreed - 17/04/2019 08:58:29 PM 380 Views
To prove Targaryen ancestry - 18/04/2019 07:26:02 PM 354 Views
But along those same lines.... - 18/04/2019 11:54:06 PM 340 Views
Cersei's got other plans for the Targeryan girl - 22/04/2019 10:57:32 AM 373 Views
The title of the finale episode needs to be.. - 22/04/2019 06:00:18 PM 375 Views

Reply to Message