Active Users:1097 Time:22/11/2024 11:58:45 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM

The reactions of the characters of the book are based on the character's perception. As a reader, we are privileged to know the totality of that character.

Based on that totality, "it" is appropriate based on the context.

Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. Cannoli - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 698 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. damookster - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 423 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. TheCrownless - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 449 Views
I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history" TheCrownless - 13/11/2018 01:26:41 AM 469 Views
Re: I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history" Cannoli - 13/11/2018 02:40:05 AM 425 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. Legolas - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 411 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 409 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* TyrReborn - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 304 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? Legolas - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 392 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain damookster - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 370 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 386 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity Cannoli - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 421 Views
Okay, sure. Legolas - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 420 Views
Interesting.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 400 Views
Because it is just contempt Roland00 - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 538 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. Legolas - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 398 Views
Who's on the phone? aerocontrols - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 402 Views
Sure, I agree. Legolas - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 415 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong fionwe1987 - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 416 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book HyogaRott - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 394 Views
So? fionwe1987 - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 406 Views
Re: So? HyogaRott - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 375 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post Cannoli - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 398 Views
Thank you. *NM* Legolas - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 191 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes