Active Users:344 Time:13/04/2025 12:31:36 AM
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... Jeordam Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM

just kind of pointing out the fact that we call people "It" all the time. I had one specific example that was applied to the two different mindsets of the speaker. One was used out of ambiguity, while the other was to dehumanize. The difference was the intent of the speaker.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 759 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 483 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 501 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 462 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 463 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 331 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 452 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 427 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 450 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 488 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 485 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 466 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 605 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 460 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 470 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 478 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 471 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 456 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 462 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 434 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 456 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 219 Views

Reply to Message