Active Users:1144 Time:23/11/2024 03:03:26 AM
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. damookster Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM

All the Dark One’s resurrections of Forsaken contained elements that were punishments for their failures. Like being shorter, weaker, older, uglier. Or in Ishamael’s case, being alive. So in RJ’s world, transsexualism is a torment inflicted by the evil deity? That’s the conclusion, amirite?

What we really learn is that it’s probably for the best RJ is gone. His creation would never make it today. It’s not diverse enough.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 698 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 424 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 449 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 413 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 409 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 304 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 393 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 371 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 387 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 421 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 421 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 401 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 538 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 399 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 404 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 416 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 417 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 394 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 406 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 375 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 398 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 191 Views

Reply to Message