The problem with your logic is that you think moral consistency is some kind of bar to homophobia.
No, the point I think he is making is that I do not discriminate against homosexuality except in the normal everyday acceptable ways. Such as not engaging in it and so forth. I treat homosexual activity the same way I treat heterosexual activity. And there are many sort of heterosexual relationships and activities which are not legitimized by marriage or cannot be engaged in marriage as well.
The ridiculous standards by which you expand the definitions of homophobia to maintain its relevance make everyone who is not actually homosexual a homophobe". People who refuse to have sex with a member of same sex are thus homophobic, especially if their reason for refraining is that they are not only not attracted to the same sex, or enticed or stimulated by the activity, but actually turned off, is well within the definition of an "aversion" to it.
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*