Active Users:1147 Time:23/11/2024 04:21:12 AM
Regarding phobia Jeordam Send a noteboard - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM

Specifically regarding phobia...which is defined as an irrational fear or aversion to something....

I'm just wondering where the line is drawn in declaring that someone has a phobia to something as opposed to just doesn't like/approve of it. Where is that line? (Granted, the logical question to follow up on that is how does one feel that they have the ability/knowledge to determine someone else has reached phobic levels.) Coincidentally, I watched that movie from the 90's Arachnophobia (great flick by the way). In that movie, the main character has an actual issue with spiders...to the point that he freezes up when confronted with them. Through a normal day, he is a husband, father, successful doctor, but when confronted with spiders he just locks up. His behavior changes. I've read Cannoli's writings for probably over a decade now. Seen him interact with a very diverse group here. I don't see a behavior change that would demonstrate an active phobia.... I see him not agreeing with an individuals actions/life. I see him not agreeing with a social stance/belief system. I don't see a behavior change or irrational actions spurred by that fear. I don't see violence (which can be a fear response).

Here's a personal example. I don't eat sea food. From any type of fish to shellfish to any invertebrate. Not my thing. I live less than 10 minutes from the ocean. Fresh and very good seafood is but moments away from me at any given moment. I don't like it. Is this a phobia?

I know how I would characterize it, but how would you? In today's day and age, disagreement or non-approval has been equated with being a phobia or hate. They are not the same.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1099 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 437 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 408 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 420 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 231 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 416 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 229 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 465 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 398 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 437 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 437 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 426 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 426 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 366 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 420 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 430 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 436 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 437 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 408 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 443 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 504 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 391 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 408 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 429 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 405 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 388 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 421 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 415 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 412 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 403 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 408 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 432 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 426 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 425 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 267 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 410 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 404 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 213 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 432 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 392 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 402 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 433 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 388 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 465 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 419 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 414 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 478 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 390 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 437 Views

Reply to Message