Active Users:1205 Time:23/11/2024 04:29:25 AM
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny random thoughts Send a noteboard - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM

"If you think being a bottom makes you weak, I suggest you give it a go and see how you do"

Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1100 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 439 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 408 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 420 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 231 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 416 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 229 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 465 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 399 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 437 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 437 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 426 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 426 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 366 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 421 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 430 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 436 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 438 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 410 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 443 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 505 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 392 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 408 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 429 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 405 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 389 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 422 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 415 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 412 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 403 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 409 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 433 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 426 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 425 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 267 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 411 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 405 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 213 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 432 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 392 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 402 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 434 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 389 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 465 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 419 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 414 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 478 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 390 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 437 Views

Reply to Message