with you and fling fire and salty-ness your way. That's not who I want to be. Instead, I will say that I disagree with your line of thinking...especially believing that all of a group can (should?) be characterized by a small subset of that group.
I will also reiterate that those actions are in no way excusable or acceptable. I still question the motives, timing, and overall storytelling of these women. Why? Because I question everything.
I don't really take much at face value. Words are cheep. I would like some proof.
~Jeordam
help me out here: are you one of those republicans who insists Bill Clinton's affairs are fact? because if you're willing to believe that Bill Clinton sexually harassed women with the same level of proof of these women saying Roy Moore sexually harassed/assaulted them, but still think you need more solid proof than has been offered, then you are part of the problem i am talking about.
so what do we know? we know at least five women have come forward saying Roy Moore either sexually molested them, or sexually assaulted them, or sexually harassed them when they were teenagers. we also know Roy Moore was banned from entering the local mall because -- and maybe this is the kind of proof you're looking for? -- he was spending too much time chasing teenage girls
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman