View original postis that decision late in book seven to have literally zero Slytherins side with the good guys. Basically going back to the simplistic take of the first few books, and largely undoing her own effort to make Slytherin a bit more human with characters like Slughorn and of course Snape.
Yes, Slughorn returning later could have worked, since he is something of a coward, but having all of them leave really undid most of my goodwill towards the house.
View original postAs you pointed out on Facebook, a lot of the people you know are lawyers. Just saying.
It's terrible. The worst part of dealing with the law, bar none.
View original postHe's a kid. A single child brought up in a snobistic, elitist, racist family with delusions of grandeur. He doesn't break out of that easily, lacking Sirius' rebellious streak, but as Dumbledore easily sees, his heart isn't in it.
Sure, and he's not evil like Voldemort, but in the context of "I'm going to announce to my friends the people I consider myself most like," I should hope the scion of a snobistic, elitist, racist family ranks rather lowly.
View original postI think you mean because he looked like his admittedly obnoxious father. The complexity of Snape is one of the elements that make the books so much more than the children's books they appear to be. He's mean and cruel to his students, the nasty kind of teacher who likes to be feared and score points with students by humiliating others. And I don't mean Harry, who can take it and whom he is, in a twisted way, trying to prepare and harden for what he knows awaits him. I mean his behaviour to other students. But he's also loyal at heart and remarkably brave, playing the double agent for so long. He's the kind of person you need to win wars - the kind willing to do what it takes to get the job done. You won't get there with only the heroic kind of people.
Yes, father. Mitigated by his mother's eyes. Mea culpa, but my point stands. Harry is an obnoxious twerp, but you should at least allow him to be an obnoxious twerp before punishing him for the sins of his father.
I think Snape is a phenomenally well-written character, although I found and continue to find his "Mudblood" outburst at Lily a remarkably poorly written scenario. And I agree that he's brave and loyal. But see above re: public association. "The kind willing to do what it takes to get the job done" are generally pretty terrible people.
View original postAlso, I don't think Snape ever actually hates Harry, and certainly not at first sight. It's a lot more complicated than that.
Conceded. He's still an ass.
View original postReally not that terrible at all. A lot of successful people in business or politics or academia or whatever have more than a little Slughorn in them, which I dare say was the point. He seems like Rowling's way of bringing a little balance back and reminding her readers that there's more to Slytherin than just 'evil genocidal maniacs'. There's a reason why Slytherin was one of the four founding houses, after all - which makes that moment in book seven that I mentioned all the sadder.
I agree with this, though again--most people in business and politics and academia are profoundly narcissistic. Failing to be an evil genocidal maniac is not really high praise.
View original postAnother aspect of the series that's pushing the children's literature barriers, is Rowling's nuanced take on how easily 'good' people can cooperate with or even promote evil, out of fear or ambition or misguided beliefs.
Agreed, though I think most of the very good children's novels do this. Like THE DARK IS RISING, or A WRINKLE IN TIME. Harry Potter is an excellent body of work.
View original postI think Cannoli had a few good points there. I would add that a not negligible part of HP readers has at least some familiarity with fan fic, many of which went for alternative takes such as telling the story from a Slytherin perspective, or at least a non-Gryffindor one. And yes, the epilogue counts as fan fic.
We disagree on very little.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*