Active Users:830 Time:24/11/2024 08:30:36 AM
The new Command and Conquer requires an internet connection for single player. grogg0316 Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 02:13:09 PM
It could be a great boon. The internet enabled you to download dozens of quality modules for NWN, and more that were worth at least one play through.

But more and more, it is becoming a great big pain in the butt. Even when a game is played exclusively single-player, there's still some internet-based requirement like a DRM or (like in Dragon Age) some sort of account-based save system. I didn't have internet for a few hours the other day and I couldn't access my recently unlocked specializations on a new character! Why? Because I wasn't logged into my account.

Seriously, it's like the game companies are trying to get us to stop buying their products.


But EA swears it wasn't for DRM. Whatever.

8: Gamers shall have the right to not be treated as potential criminals by developers or publishers.

9: Gamers shall have the right to demand that a single-player game not force them to be connected to the Internet every time they wish to play.
Forum posts should be like a skirt. Long enough to cover the topic but short enough to keep your attention.
Gamer Bill of Rights
Reply to message
Why must they drag the internet into everything? A (very very bitter) Dawn of War 2 rant - 25/03/2010 02:19:44 AM 966 Views
internet will become the bane of single-player gaming, imo - 25/03/2010 03:21:46 AM 639 Views
NWN? - 25/03/2010 05:12:46 AM 804 Views
The new Command and Conquer requires an internet connection for single player. - 25/03/2010 02:13:09 PM 939 Views
In full agreement on the DRM. But the Tyranids predated the Zerg by quite a long time. - 26/03/2010 12:24:50 AM 698 Views
Re: In full agreement on the DRM. But the Tyranids predated the Zerg by quite a long time. - 26/03/2010 03:29:50 AM 957 Views
Re: In full agreement on the DRM. But the Tyranids predated the Zerg by quite a long time. - 26/03/2010 09:22:01 AM 847 Views
Funny. - 29/03/2010 05:56:30 PM 990 Views
Re: Funny. - 29/03/2010 08:09:12 PM 758 Views
Thanks. - 30/03/2010 02:29:45 AM 817 Views

Reply to Message