Active Users:709 Time:15/11/2024 12:12:14 PM
It all comes down to depth. Aemon Send a noteboard - 01/09/2009 04:33:24 AM
Brawl has none. Melee had the perfect amount, in that it was easily approachable, yet quite difficult nonetheless to get really good. Not as difficult as in a true, pure fighter, but more than enough that only a few very rare people made it to the upper tiers. Even there, there were moves that people couldn't do consistently, every single time, so there was still room for improvement, if not much. Melee to this day has top players who dominate. The Kens, PC Chris', etc, rarely lose, even to their own ilk. There are no such people for Brawl.

Back to the beginning though, yeah; Brawl has no depth. I've hardly played the game at all, yet when I sit down to play against players that have played it constantly since release, I only lose a few more games than I win. Brawl is a crapshoot, a game of rock-paper-scissors. There are no advanced techniques or strategies to try to pull off, there aren't really even any combos. Everything they can dumb down, they have. Even things that weren't advanced at all, but just took a little skill. For example, sweet-spotting the ledge. In Melee, you had to time it just right with your up-b so you'd just baaaaarely grab the ledge. Any higher and the waiting smash would catch your fingertips and you'd die a horrible death. In Brawl? Auto-sweet-spot. Get anywhere near the ledge, and you're golden.

Everywhere you look, Brawl is like that. It's slower, you can't do moves as rapidly as before (so that you can't combo), tripping was added to remove dash dancing, wave dashing and all the other neat moves were fixed, and the list just goes on and on.

In summary, I don't like Brawl because you can't get good at it. There are no players out there who could consistently beat most other players. I want to play Smash as a fighter, instead of just a party game, and you just can't do that anymore.
Reply to message
So what's the most disappointing game in your current library? - 31/08/2009 05:50:30 AM 1010 Views
hmmm.... - 31/08/2009 06:26:01 AM 845 Views
That John Woo game, I guess.... - 31/08/2009 06:30:07 AM 823 Views
Re: So what's the most disappointing game in your current library? - 31/08/2009 06:52:31 AM 1158 Views
I would have to say - 31/08/2009 08:51:40 AM 828 Views
The worst game I own is a DS game. Does that count? - 31/08/2009 12:40:18 PM 790 Views
Wow. Those games are great on the Computer and Wii. - 31/08/2009 07:37:22 PM 803 Views
Wait. Actually... - 31/08/2009 07:39:08 PM 791 Views
Star Wars Galaxies *NM* - 31/08/2009 12:51:05 PM 444 Views
Braaaaaaaaaaaaawl. *NM* - 31/08/2009 01:37:25 PM 416 Views
I second that one. *NM* - 31/08/2009 04:27:07 PM 436 Views
Funny, I loved every minute of it, and still do. - 31/08/2009 04:59:38 PM 798 Views
My reasoning... - 31/08/2009 06:49:00 PM 859 Views
It all comes down to depth. - 01/09/2009 04:33:24 AM 818 Views
Thanks for that, Matt. - 01/09/2009 05:22:41 AM 831 Views
Re: Thanks for that, Matt. - 02/09/2009 08:29:50 PM 741 Views
Re: Infamous - 31/08/2009 04:51:40 PM 749 Views
Prototype is cool - 31/08/2009 04:53:50 PM 787 Views
Re: I actually sorted liked prototype's story line. - 01/09/2009 01:03:09 AM 800 Views
Call of Duty 4 - 31/08/2009 05:20:23 PM 829 Views
Re: Call of Duty 4 - 31/08/2009 06:51:07 PM 795 Views
You're right about the enemies. Also, The Witcher was great. - 31/08/2009 09:27:58 PM 733 Views
Well, I generally don't keep disappointing games. *NM* - 31/08/2009 05:21:56 PM 416 Views
Halo 3 - 01/09/2009 03:41:20 AM 732 Views
Hmmm... that's a toughy... - 01/09/2009 06:15:20 AM 780 Views
Armored Core Nine Breaker - 01/09/2009 01:58:10 PM 735 Views
Etrian oddesey - 01/09/2009 09:58:51 PM 878 Views
Prince of Persia - 02/09/2009 01:40:40 PM 651 Views
Re: So what's the most disappointing game in your current library? - 03/09/2009 07:44:39 PM 718 Views
Age of Conan - The 1st 20 levels were truly excellent... - 04/09/2009 06:04:34 PM 787 Views
spore... - 11/10/2009 01:19:44 PM 718 Views

Reply to Message