MW3: YT's Take. (all multiplayer, because honestly, single player sucks and you played it before))
MightyYT Send a noteboard - 22/01/2012 10:32:43 AM
Dear Infinity Ward,
You continue to amaze me at being able to make a near perfect multiplayer experience and turn it into some kind demented nightmare. You "improve" the game to the point of breaking it and you refuse to have a Beta Test to try and prevent glitches.
There is some good in it. The killstreak system is much improved. You actually listened to the people playing the game for once and allow you to switch between multiple killstreaks so one no longer has to call in the airstrike before the UAV to find the enemies. Good job.
The different killstreak classes are brilliant. HAving one for number of kills without dieing, one for total number of kills, and one for unlocking perks is probably the best decision you guys made since making killstreaks.
That is about where the goodness ends. Most of the choppers/planes are next to useless. I have shot just about everything down with one rocket (except the AC130 and Ospreys) most of the time before it even gets close enough to kill someone. Speaking of the Ospreys...I understand why it takes so long for them to come in, but seriously, I shoot down every Osprey before it drop even one care package.
And the Juggernaut packages? Almost useless. So you get extra health, but you move at a quarter of the normal pace and you either have a Riot Shield and pistol, or an LMG with MASSIVE recoil, so much so that after firing it takes almost a full second to reset to where it was before the firing.
And all this hasn't even gotten to the guns yet. This is an area where a Beta would have come in handy. Just about anything Akimbo is deadly. Over deadly. Like 1887 in MW2 deadly. you just barely have to aim in someone's general direction and BAM, they die. The Striker is this game equivalent of MW2's 1887. A shotgun that can nearly be used for sniping. But about every other weapon takes 4 or 5 shots to kill someone?
But most of this could be forgiven if you would have fixed your connection issues. Very Terrible. Worse than MW2. Oh sure, when you are in a party, the WHOLE party can now get into a game. Congratulations, you fixed a huge mistake from that last one. You still have massive LAG problems. Whoever has host will do the best and if you have 3 bars or less, you might as well quit. Way to go on Not Improving this aspect.
Basically, IW, your game has some slight improvements over its predecessor but is a MASSIVE FAILURE over all because you have actually made the lag problem worse.
If I didn't have so many idiots on my friends list who still play this, I would never have touched it. Thank god no one bought my copy, it is on loan to a friend.
I am going back to Battlefield. A far superior game to this piece of shit.
You continue to amaze me at being able to make a near perfect multiplayer experience and turn it into some kind demented nightmare. You "improve" the game to the point of breaking it and you refuse to have a Beta Test to try and prevent glitches.
There is some good in it. The killstreak system is much improved. You actually listened to the people playing the game for once and allow you to switch between multiple killstreaks so one no longer has to call in the airstrike before the UAV to find the enemies. Good job.
The different killstreak classes are brilliant. HAving one for number of kills without dieing, one for total number of kills, and one for unlocking perks is probably the best decision you guys made since making killstreaks.
That is about where the goodness ends. Most of the choppers/planes are next to useless. I have shot just about everything down with one rocket (except the AC130 and Ospreys) most of the time before it even gets close enough to kill someone. Speaking of the Ospreys...I understand why it takes so long for them to come in, but seriously, I shoot down every Osprey before it drop even one care package.
And the Juggernaut packages? Almost useless. So you get extra health, but you move at a quarter of the normal pace and you either have a Riot Shield and pistol, or an LMG with MASSIVE recoil, so much so that after firing it takes almost a full second to reset to where it was before the firing.
And all this hasn't even gotten to the guns yet. This is an area where a Beta would have come in handy. Just about anything Akimbo is deadly. Over deadly. Like 1887 in MW2 deadly. you just barely have to aim in someone's general direction and BAM, they die. The Striker is this game equivalent of MW2's 1887. A shotgun that can nearly be used for sniping. But about every other weapon takes 4 or 5 shots to kill someone?
But most of this could be forgiven if you would have fixed your connection issues. Very Terrible. Worse than MW2. Oh sure, when you are in a party, the WHOLE party can now get into a game. Congratulations, you fixed a huge mistake from that last one. You still have massive LAG problems. Whoever has host will do the best and if you have 3 bars or less, you might as well quit. Way to go on Not Improving this aspect.
Basically, IW, your game has some slight improvements over its predecessor but is a MASSIVE FAILURE over all because you have actually made the lag problem worse.
If I didn't have so many idiots on my friends list who still play this, I would never have touched it. Thank god no one bought my copy, it is on loan to a friend.
I am going back to Battlefield. A far superior game to this piece of shit.
Castle: This is so weird. I dressed up as him for Halloween.
Beckett: Me too.
~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Beckett: Me too.
~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
MW3: YT's Take. (all multiplayer, because honestly, single player sucks and you played it before))
22/01/2012 10:32:43 AM
- 546 Views
About the lag problems.
16/02/2012 04:09:36 AM
- 590 Views
About the lag...
16/02/2012 06:12:55 AM
- 431 Views
Sorry you're having trouble. Lag has nothing to do with download speed, though.
16/02/2012 02:52:07 PM
- 443 Views
Re: Sorry you're having trouble. Lag has nothing to do with download speed, though.
16/02/2012 08:03:23 PM
- 447 Views