Active Users:1136 Time:22/11/2024 10:53:39 PM
Something like that. Zalis Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 08:20:55 PM
Being able to chill in a city and check your auctions, talk to guildies, etc, would be fun, even on a phone. Some limited grinding wouldn't be out of the question either. Of course, then you have the issue of people trying to raid while on their phones, and dragging everyone else down with them. :P Maybe limiting mobile clients to non-instanced areas would be a good idea.


My distaste for WoW & MMORPGs aside, I agree that mobile versions should probably be 'lite' for the reasons above.

I could see a market niche for an exclusively mobile MMORPG, but WoW's the only thing popular enough to make it worthwhile. There would be something inherently cozy about getting back home to log in proper, though. So maybe mobile-only wouldn't go anywhere. iPad/Tablet, maybe...
The sword might be grateful to the forge fire, but never fond of it.
This message last edited by Zalis on 13/09/2010 at 08:22:13 PM
Reply to message
So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones? - 11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM 886 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue. - 11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM 724 Views
WoW graphics don't matter that much.` - 11/09/2010 10:22:23 PM 633 Views
They matter to me. *NM* - 12/09/2010 02:58:50 AM 342 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad - 12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM 613 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior. - 12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM 699 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense - 12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM 791 Views
Oh I understand. - 12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM 615 Views
they really aren't bad - 12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM 598 Views
You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does - 12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM 663 Views
no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD - 12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM 697 Views
Yes, they are. - 12/09/2010 10:04:49 PM 664 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right? - 12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM 664 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using - 13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM 626 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times. - 13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM 615 Views
Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times. - 13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM 672 Views
That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life. - 13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM 670 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life. - 13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM 612 Views
Mass Effect 2 isn't that demanding if you have a desktop - 13/09/2010 02:46:09 PM 633 Views
I could, if I really wanted to - 13/09/2010 09:16:07 PM 764 Views
This is a meaningless conversation. - 13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM 591 Views
Not at all - 13/09/2010 09:25:08 PM 674 Views
below modern standards doesn't mean "bad" - 13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM 617 Views
Pong: great graphics or greatest graphics? - 13/09/2010 05:23:56 AM 672 Views
WoW graphics are bad for todays standards *NM* - 13/09/2010 05:32:32 AM 293 Views
You're a fucking idiot. - 13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM 585 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about - 13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM 640 Views
Please don't. - 14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM 617 Views
that's fine wish you were a cmb admin *NM* - 14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM 319 Views
Desktop or gtfo. *NM* - 12/09/2010 02:54:36 AM 273 Views
Seconded. *NM* - 13/09/2010 09:00:55 PM 377 Views
Why would I want to? *NM* - 13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM 310 Views
I can see how it would be sort of neat. - 13/09/2010 07:30:40 PM 545 Views
Something like that. - 13/09/2010 08:20:55 PM 701 Views
You can already do auction stuff - 13/09/2010 09:35:04 PM 657 Views
not to long - 27/09/2010 07:17:21 AM 783 Views

Reply to Message